Divergence theorem over a hemisphere

jonwell
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I was told this problem could be done with divergence theorem, instead of as a surface integral, by adding the unit disc on the bottom, doing the calculation, then subtracting it again.

Homework Statement



t03swo.jpg


Homework Equations



32c955a56b8e720af3b926c482107ae9.png


The Attempt at a Solution



for del . f I get i + j = 2. Which makes the integral equal twice the volume of the hemisphere, or 4/3 pi. Now I'm supposed to subtract the unit disc, but I get pi when I calculate that surface, which leaves me with 1/3 pi. The answer should be 7/6 pi.

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The outward pointing normal to the disk is -k. So F.(-k) is -1 and the contribution from the disk is -pi. The total integral from the divergence theorem is 4pi/3 (as you said). I think that makes the integral over the upper hemisphere 7pi/3, doesn't it? Not 7pi/6?
 
Ya, I got that a couple times too (after I remembered the orientation), however the answer I was provided is 7/6 pi. That could be wrong. I'll re-do the surface integral the other way and see what I come up with I guess.
 
Good idea! Let me know what you get.
 
well, I'm still getting 7pi/3, so I'm going to assume that the two of us combined are smarter than the given answer ;) Thanks for your help!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top