Do All Lower Energy States Exist When n=3 in an Infinite Potential Well?

victoria13
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
ok so i have a question on infinite potential wells... if you have the energy state when n=3, does that mean that you have to have the energy state when n=2 and n=1?

Ok basically the Q we are given is:

A particle of mass m is trapped in an infi nitely deep one-dimensional potential well between x = 0 and x = a, and at a time t = 0 is described by the wave function

psi(x,t=0) = sin(pix/a)cos(2pix/a)

(i) What possible values may be found for the energy of the particle?
(ii) What is the expectation (or average) value of the energy of the particle?
(iii) Give an expression showing the time dependence of the wave function, psi(x,t).
[Hint: Use sinAcosB = 1/2(sin(A + B) + sin(A-B))].

so when i use the hint and find the equation in terms of just sin i get

psi(x) = 0.5sin(3pix/a) + 0.5sin(-pix/a)

so does this mean that there is just the 3rd energy state, or the third and first, or all 3?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The particle is in a superposition of the n=3 state and the n=1 state.
 
so the energies are when n=3 and n=1?
 
Yes, the measurement can only result in energies of states which you have some chance of finding the particle in.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top