Do charges distribute equally on inner and outer surfaces of a spherical shell?

AI Thread Summary
In a charged spherical shell, the distribution of charge depends on the presence of any charges within the shell. If there are no charges inside, all of the net charge will reside on the outer surface, not equally distributed between the inner and outer surfaces. Gauss's law supports this conclusion, indicating that the charge distribution minimizes repulsion. Therefore, for a net charge of +4.0 micro coulombs, it will be entirely on the outer surface if no internal charges exist. Understanding this principle is crucial for grasping electrostatics.
kd001
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
If a spherical shell has a net charge of say +4.0micro coulombs do I assume that this charge is equally distributed between the inner and outer surfaces of the shell (ie +2.0 micro coulombs on the inner surface and +2.0 micro coulombs on the outer surface)?

Thanks

*This is not homework. I'm trying to test my understanding.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No- I can tell you this instantly by thinking about what would happen if you change the inner and outer radii of the shell- which you have unspecified- to extremes. If the inner radius is 0.1m and the outer one is 100m, does it make sense that half the charge is on the 4*pi area inner surface, and half is distributed on the 10,000*pi area outer surface? That certainly doesn't minimise repulsion!

I think the charge is stored on the outer edge- but I am not certain, some line of reasoning is telling me it is uniform but this doesn't seem very intuitive to me either.
 
kd001 said:
If a spherical shell has a net charge of say +4.0micro coulombs do I assume that this charge is equally distributed between the inner and outer surfaces of the shell (ie +2.0 micro coulombs on the inner surface and +2.0 micro coulombs on the outer surface)?
No. How the charge distributes itself depends upon whether there is charge contained within the shell. Consider Gauss's law with the gaussian surface through the material of the shell.

If there are no other charges, then all the charge will be on the outer surface.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top