Do Elastic Waves Carry Momentum in Solids?

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Its not really a problem - more like a question my teacher asked us.


Homework Equations


My problem is that in my opinion the wave concept is quite vague. Are we talking about a single narrow pulse propagating through the medium or collective vibrations of all the atoms in the solid? If all atoms are performing simple harmonic motion then the momentum averaged over one period is 0. But who says all waves in solids are like this, i.e. when you release a spring a single longitudional wave travels down the spring and it obviously carries momentum. What do you think my teacher referred to when he said elastic waves?


The Attempt at a Solution


Edit: I looked it up in my book and it said waves (which kind I don't know) carry no physical momentum but act as if they had momentum p=hbar*k. What is that supposed to mean!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://silverdialogues.fas.nyu.edu/docs/IO/24452/peskin.pdf
tldr: it depends.

Travelling waves generally carry energy and momentum without net movement of the medium... but not all waves do. A purely transverse mechanical wave, for eg, would not. see p23 of the link.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top