Do Frames Affect Dimensional Units?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BitWiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frames Units
BitWiz
Gold Member
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Say a ship is coasting in space at an arbitrary speed and velocity with respect to an observer. If a joule of energy (generated on the ship) is used to instantaneously accelerate the ship:

From an external observer, the acceleration and delta-v observed is dependent on the ship's initial speed (not velocity), correct? The higher the measured speed, the less acceleration and delta-v observed? If I apply a second joule in a separate event, both the acceleration and delta-v will appear to be less than the first time for that observer. Correct?

From within the ship, the perceived acceleration will be the same for both events? If I observe a destination star directly in front of me, the delta-v's will also appear to be the same with the relativistic inertia, time, and length effects canceling out?

Say the ship is already accelerating at a steady rate, and I again apply an extra joule in two events. From the ship's frame, will both events now be different, the second being of less magnitude than the first? What will the external observer see?

Finally, do frames affect or have dimensional units?

Say that two observers each have their own frame and a frame in common. If their individual motions have fixed vectors such that the two observers appear fixed in space with respect to each other, then their individual frames and the common frame are the same.(?) Newtonian mechanics apply. Is it fair to say that this state has a unit dimensional term of γ0?

If the vectors do not match, then motion will appear in the common frame, and relativistic effects will apply, but the individual frames are unaffected, and to the observers, interchangeable. Is this correct? Is it fair to say that the common frame has a unit dimension of γ1 but the individual frames have a γ0 dimension?

If one of the vectors is changing over time, then each observer will appear to observe an identical force being applied to the other, but only one will be able to measure the force with an accelerometer. Correct? If so, should this accelerating frame be described with different dimensional units even though from the observers' points-of-view, all else is the same. (?) Would we now have a unit dimension of γ0 for one observer, γ1 for the other, and γ2 for the common frame?

Thank you kindly for your comments.

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If a joule of energy (generated on the ship) is used to instantaneously accelerate the ship:
It matters how this energy is used.

From an external observer, the acceleration and delta-v observed is dependent on the ship's initial speed (not velocity), correct?
It depends on the acceleration method, the speed, the direction of the spaceship and the direction of the acceleration.

If I apply a second joule in a separate event, both the acceleration and delta-v will appear to be less than the first time for that observer. Correct?

From within the ship, the perceived acceleration will be the same for both events?
Again, depends on how you spend that 1J.

Finally, do frames affect or have dimensional units?
What does that mean?

Say that two observers each have their own frame and a frame in common.
Which frame, what do you mean with "in common"? Observers do not own frames.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top