Do Lx and Lz Angular Momentum Operators Exhibit an Uncertainty Relation?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 5K views
leviathanX777
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
The operators used for the x and y components of angular momentum are:

7B%5Cpartial%7D%7B%5Cpartial%7Bz%7D%7D%20%20-%20z%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%7D%7B%5Cpartial%7By%7D%7D).jpg


7B%5Cpartial%7D%7B%5Cpartial%7Bx%7D%7D%20%20-%20x%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%7D%7B%5Cpartial%7Bz%7D%7D).jpg


Show that Lx and Lz obey an uncertainty relation




2. No relevant equations.




The Attempt at a Solution



I'm going on that the assumption that if LxLy - LyLz does not equal zero then they don't commute and have an uncertainty relation. However I can only get this equal to zero and don't know how to show the uncertainty rrelation if I achieve one.
 
on Phys.org
leviathanX777 said:
I'm going on that the assumption that if LxLy - LyLz does not equal zero then they don't commute and have an uncertainty relation. However I can only get this equal to zero and don't know how to show the uncertainty rrelation if I achieve one.

if you mean:

[Lx, Ly] = LxLy - LyLx

then it does not equal to zero, angular moment is the cross product: r x p

so Lx = y.Pz - z.Py Ly = x.Pz - z.Px

where x and y and z are position operators and Px, Py and Pz are momentum operators, stick those into your commutator and try again, you should end up with

[Lx, Ly] = ihLz

where h is the reduced Planck constant. and Lz is the Angular momentum operator for z axis
 
Ah I got it solved in the end. Just made a minor mistake. Thanks!