Do Protons Move? Answers to Your Physics Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter manuel325
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Protons
AI Thread Summary
Protons do not move in electric currents; instead, current is defined as the flow of negatively charged electrons. The confusion arises because the conventional direction of current is based on the movement of positive charges, a concept established before the discovery of electrons. When a positive charge is referenced, it indicates a deficiency of electrons, which actually move in the opposite direction. In various materials, both positive and negative charges can move, but current is always defined as the direction positive charges would flow. Understanding this distinction clarifies the relationship between charge movement and current flow.
manuel325
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi , in the first chapters of my physics book states that positive charges don't move , but now this new chapter about curruent and resistance says that the direction of the current is the direction in which the positive charges flow or move . I'm confused :confused:
Can someone explain please? , I don't need a scientific explanation because that would confuse more:frown: , just a simple answer because I'll have an exam soon .Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
protons do move and current is the flow of negatively charged particles electrons... :) not the positive charge.
 
When I first read the title to this thread I wanted to respond "Of course, protons move! I just moved a lot of them when I picked up this laptop computer."

But I see you are asking a serious question. You are asking specifically about "charge" moving in an electric line, right? "Charge" is not the same as "protons" or "electrons". If the electrons move in one direction, then a negative "charge" is moving in that direction while a positive "charge" is moving in the opposite direction, even though no actual "protons" may move. It was, I believe, Benjamin Franklin who decided to declare that current move in a particular direction and, from the point of view of some physical matter actually moving, he got it wrong! Of course, he did not know anything about "protons" or "electrons". He was working with static electricity generators and, seeing a spark jump between his finger and the generator, assumed something was coming from the generator to his finger, not realizing that the "electrons" were actually going the other way. On a larger scale, he assumed that lightning was something going from the clouds to the earth. In fact, it is more often electrons going from the Earth to the cloud.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Protons don't move. When they say a positive charge moves. Think of it as electrons moving the opposite way. Say if you have a piece of metal and one side has a positive charge, what this means is there is a deficiency of electrons and so the positive charge will repel and electrons will flow to disperse the positive charge.
 
  • Like
Likes nikunj kumar shaunak and manuel325
Franklin didn't necessarily get it wrong. The idea that "electric current is the movement of electrons" is only true in metals. In liquids, gases, and some non-metallic solids, both positive and negatively charged particles move in opposite directions.

But instead of worrying about all that detail, in different materials, we always define "current flow" to be positive in the direction that positive charges would move, even if there aren't any positive charges that are actually moving.
 
  • Like
Likes nikunj kumar shaunak and manuel325
Hi,i think proton don't move but we take the flow of current as the direction of flow of +ve charge and opposite to the flow of current is the flow of -ve charge.we take it so because at the time of discovery of current electron were not discovered,so that's why we take the flow of current as the movement of +ve charge :oldconfused::oldconfused::oldconfused::oldconfused::oldconfused:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top