Do Rotational Inertia Calculations Require Integration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the rotational inertia of three balls attached to a rod, with the user confirming their calculation of 3ML^2/2 as correct without needing integration. They also inquire about the behavior of a wheel turning at constant rotational speed, where they assert that each point on the rim maintains constant translational velocity due to the relationship v=wr. Feedback indicates that their understanding of the rotational and translational dynamics is accurate, although there are additional correct choices regarding the wheel's motion. Overall, the user seeks clarification on their physics concepts and receives validation for their reasoning.
blackout85
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
First questionThree identical balls, with masses M, 2M, and 3M are fastened to a massless rod of length L as shown. The rotational inertia about the left end of the rod is: Thats the layout below. Would calculus be needed in this problem (intergration) because then I am in trouble. I know the rotation at the end of rod is I=ML^2/3. Could I use that formula.

3M-----L/2----2M----L/2-----M

work:
I came up with an answer of 3ML^2/2
does that look right. I added the two end mass and lengths using the equation I=mr^2--> simply plugging in the values and adding. Would that be correct.

second question:
If a wheel turns with a costant rotational speed then: each point on its rim moves with constant roational velocity, each point on its rim moves with constant translational acceleration, the wheel turns with constant translation acceleration, the wheel turns through equal angles in equal times, the angle through which the wheel turns in each second increases as time goes on, the angle through which the wheel turns in each second decreases as time goes on.

work
I thought if the wheel turns with a constant translational velocity along the rim because of the the equation v=wr. Am I right to think since along the rim will have the same radius as in a wheel.

I would appreciate any feedback on both questions. Thank you :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to your first question is correct. With regards to the second question, is that copied directly from your text or have you paraphrased it?
 
physics

I rechecked it
If a wheel turns with a constant rotational speed:
each point on its rim moves with a constant translational velocity
each point on its rim moves with a constant translational acceleration
the wheel turns through equal angles in equal times
the angle through which the wheel turns in each second increases as times goes on
the angle through which the wheel turns in each second decreases as time goes on

work:
I thought if the wheel turns with a constant translational velocity along the rim because of the the equation v=wr. Am I right to think since along the rim will have the same radius as in a wheel. This equation connects rotational velocity to translational velocity. Since the radius is the same for the edge in a wheel I thought that the answer is constant translational velocity.
 
You are indeed correct. Although there is one further choice which is also correct...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top