Do Solid Cylinders and Cylindrical Sections Have the Same Rotational Inertia?

AI Thread Summary
Solid cylinders and cylindrical sections with equal radii and mass densities can be assumed to have the same rotational inertia when rotating about their center. The mass distribution across the radius is identical in both cases, leading to the conclusion that their rotational inertias are equal. The derived formula for the rotational inertia of a cylindrical section matches that of a full cylinder, specifically .5MR^2, indicating that the angle measure does not affect the outcome. The discussion raises questions about whether the cylindrical section is rotating about its center of mass and its shape, suggesting further exploration of these concepts. Overall, the analysis supports the idea that both objects exhibit the same rotational inertia under the given conditions.
Zarathustra1
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Let's assume for a moment that we have two objects: a solid cylinder rotating about the center, and a section of a cylinder with a given angle rotating about the center of the would-be cylinder (had it been a full cylinder). They have an equal radii, and we will modify their mass-densities in such a way that the cylinder and the cylindrical section have equal masses.

We can conclude that the mass distribution across the radius is equal in both objects. As such, would it be safe to assume they have the same rotational inertias?

If I did my math correctly, then yes. I attempted to derive a formula for the rotational inertia of a cylindrical section, and it turned out to be same formula for that of a full cylinder: .5MR^2. I was a little intrigued to see that the angle measure canceled out in the process, but it sort of makes sense. Anyone want to verify this?

(Although this question occurred to me after doing a related homework problem, it isn't a homework problem itself, so I hope this is the proper forum for this question.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this section of a cylinder rotating about its center of mass? Is the section shaped sort of like a piece of pie?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top