Do we need Lindblad operators to describe spontaneous emission

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessity of Lindblad operators in the context of describing spontaneous emission, particularly in relation to quantum mechanics and quantum optics. It contrasts the treatment of spontaneous emission in closed systems versus open systems, focusing on the formulation of master equations and density matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that spontaneous emission is treated as a closed system in certain quantum mechanics texts, while others argue it is more appropriately described using a master equation in quantum optics.
  • One participant explains that the evolution of an open system, which interacts with an environment, cannot be described using wave-functions, leading to the need for a reduced density matrix that evolves non-unitarily.
  • Another participant asserts that while the Lindblad equation is non-unitary, it is deterministic, challenging the notion that it describes a stochastic process.
  • Some participants emphasize that the Lindblad equation represents the most general differential equation for Markovian evolution, which is associated with stochastic processes.
  • There is a distinction made between Markov processes and Markov probabilities, with one participant arguing that the Lindblad equation describes the probability function rather than the stochastic process itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the Lindblad equation, particularly regarding its deterministic versus stochastic characteristics, and whether it is necessary for describing spontaneous emission in two-level systems. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made regarding the definitions of stochastic processes and the nature of Markovian evolution, which are not fully explored in the discussion.

td21
Gold Member
Messages
177
Reaction score
8
In Griffith and Sakurai QM book, spontaneous emission is treated as a closed system subject to time-dependent perturbation.

Yet in quantum optics sponantanoues emission is treated as in the form master equation of density matrix. Even in two levels system where there is only one spontaneous emission rate, master equation is formulated to described sponantanoues emission. Why do we need Lindblad operators for two level system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A closed quantum system as a whole has a unitary evolution. But sometimes you need to describe the evolution of an open system where you have no access to the degrees of freedom(dof) that the system is interacting with. In those cases you need a quantity that describes the evolution of the dof of the system but not the environment. This can't be done using wave-functions. So you form the density matrix of the system+environment and then trace-out the environmental dof. The resulting quantity is called the reduced density matrix of the system and its evolution is non-unitary and non-deterministic. Such an evolution is an stochastic process and should be described by an stochastic differential equation. Now considering the Heisenberg equation of motion and some simplifying assumptions, you get the Lindblad equation.
 
ShayanJ said:
The resulting quantity is called the reduced density matrix of the system and its evolution is non-unitary and non-deterministic. Such an evolution is an stochastic process and should be described by an stochastic differential equation. Now considering the Heisenberg equation of motion and some simplifying assumptions, you get the Lindblad equation.
You are right that Lindblad equation is non-unitary, but it is deterministic and not stochastic.
 
Demystifier said:
You are right that Lindblad equation is non-unitary, but it is deterministic and not stochastic.
But Lindblad equation is the most general differential equation for a Markovian evolution. Being Markovian is a property of stochastic processes!
 
ShayanJ said:
But Lindblad equation is the most general differential equation for a Markovian evolution. Being Markovian is a property of stochastic processes!
One should distinguish Markov process from Markov probability. Markov process is indeed a stochastic process, but such a process is determined by a probability which can have a deterministic dependence on time. For instance, the standard 1-dimensional random walk is a stochastic process with a constant probability (at each step, the probability is always 1/2 for any of the two directions). The Lindblad equation describes only the probability function (more technically, the probability density matrix), not the stochastic process.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShayanJ

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K