Do weight and normal contact force always have equal and opposite effects?

AI Thread Summary
Weight and normal contact force do not always act in equal and opposite directions, as their relationship depends on the context of the object's position. When an object is on a horizontal surface, the weight force downward and the normal force upward are equal and opposite, maintaining equilibrium. However, on an inclined surface, the normal force acts perpendicular to the slope, not directly upward, requiring additional forces like friction to balance the weight. This distinction highlights the importance of understanding Newton's laws, particularly the difference between the first and third laws. Overall, the interaction of these forces varies based on the object's orientation and the forces acting upon it.
hussianm
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Do weight and normal contact force always act in equal and opposite directions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hussianm said:
Do weight and normal contact force always act in equal and opposite directions?

Welcome to the PF.

What do you think, and why? :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF.

What do you think, and why? :smile:
Well I saw this question: Newton's third law tells us that... One of the options was that weight and normal contact force are always equal and opposite and the correct answer was forces always arise in pairs. The other option were wrong :p
The correct option makes perfect sense but I wanted to know why the other statement is not correct.. Is it because there is not necessarily a contact force when there is weight acting on a body?
 
If an object is sitting on a horizontal surface, like a table or a floor, then its weight is a force downward and normal force upward. Since the object is not moving, those two must be the same (and in opposite directions).

If on the other hand, an object is sitting on a slope, on a slanting surface, gravity is downward, while the normal force is NOT upward. It is "normal" to the surface. In order that the object not move down the slope, there must be a friction force, tangent to the slope. The sum of those two vectors must be equal (and opposite) to the weight force.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
HallsofIvy said:
If an object is sitting on a horizontal surface, like a table or a floor, then its weight is a force downward and normal force upward. Since the object is not moving, those two must be the same (and in opposite directions).

If on the other hand, an object is sitting on a slope, on a slanting surface, gravity is downward, while the normal force is NOT upward. It is "normal" to the surface. In order that the object not move down the slope, there must be a friction force, tangent to the slope. The sum of those two vectors must be equal (and opposite) to the weight force.
oh! i see. i understand now. thank you for your help
 
HallsofIvy's response was an excellent example of Newton's first law. Newton's third law tells you that if the object exerts a normal force N on the table, then the table must exert an equal normal force N on the object, in the opposite direction. This is the force pair of the normal force. It is important not to confuse his first law with his third.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top