Does a symmetry need to leave the whole action invariant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Invariant Symmetry
AI Thread Summary
A symmetry is generally defined as a transformation that leaves the action invariant, but this may be overly stringent. It is argued that a more practical definition could involve mapping solutions to solutions, focusing on the behavior near extremal solutions rather than unphysical ones. The necessity of invariance for the action is linked to Noether's theorem, which connects symmetries to conservation laws. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the balance between strict definitions of symmetry and practical applications in physics. Understanding this relationship is crucial for applying Noether's theorem effectively.
nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Typically a symmetry is taken to be something that leaves the action invariant. However, on a classical level, isn't that asking way too much? To match what we conceptually mean by symmetry, we only need something that maps solutions to solutions, so something which leaves the action invariant in the neighbourhood of extremal solutions(?) (After all who cares what a symmetry operation does to unphysical solutions?). Is it because of Noether's theorem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Alright I solved my own problem. You need it to get Noether's theorem to work.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top