Does current flow in both wires or in one in our homes?

[123kid]

If we have a source of AC current with two terminals ( A and B ). We connect a device with this source. Now we say that one wire is live and other is neutral. But my question is that, how one wire is neutral. As we say that in AC current the terminals change the polarity. Its mean that some time A will be positive and some time B terminal will be positive. So when A is positive current will flow through one wire and when B is positive then current will flow through the other wire. both wires will carry current.​

May be my concept is not correct. Please help me...​

 

[Geofleur]

Imagine what happens in each of these cases, without connecting the terminals to each other through any appliance:

(1) You touch the live terminal and not the neutral one. This is dangerous, because then a current could form between the terminal and the earth, through you.

(2) You touch the neutral terminal and not the live one. Then you are just touching a wire that effectively has its other end connected to the earth. Nothing happens.

The terminology comes from what happens in those two cases. If you complete the circuit and then touch the "neutral" terminal then, yes, you are in danger again.

 

[jbriggs444]

Imagine what happens in each of these cases, without connecting the terminals to each other through any appliance:

(1) You touch the live terminal and not the neutral one. This is dangerous, because then a current could form between the terminal and the earth, through you.

(2) You touch the neutral terminal and not the live one. Then you are just touching a wire that effectively has its other end connected to the earth. Nothing happens.

The terminology comes from what happens in those two cases. If you complete the circuit and then touch the "neutral" terminal then, yes, you are in danger again.

Please do not touch the neutral wire either.

While it is probably true that nothing will happen when you touch a neutral wire, in practice, the neutral wire is not guaranteed to be at zero potential compared to the ground you are standing on. In the U.S., the neutral wire and the ground wire are separate. The presence of other devices on the neutral wire could result in a non-zero voltage there.

An outlet equipped with a "Ground Fault Interrupter" can serve as some protection against the result of touching either the live or the neutral wire. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residual-current_device

 

[Tom Rauji]

If we have a source of AC current with two terminals ( A and B ). We connect a device with this source. Now we say that one wire is live and other is neutral. But my question is that, how one wire is neutral. As we say that in AC current the terminals change the polarity. Its mean that some time A will be positive and some time B terminal will be positive. So when A is positive current will flow through one wire and when B is positive then current will flow through the other wire. both wires will carry current.
May be my concept is not correct. Please help me...​

Your concept is correct.

The neutral is called such because of the voltage to earth, not because of current. The same is true of "balanced" or "unbalanced" transmission lines. The balance or unbalance is determined by potential to Earth or surrounding space, although it becomes more complex than "neutral" because balanced also can mean currents are equal and out-of-phase.

There are three wires from the line transformer in the residential drop. Two "hots" of approximately equal voltage (120 volts nominal) with the same phase relationship but 180 degrees apart, and one neutral that is grounded at the pole and at the house to earth. The neutral in your house could carry anywhere from all of the load current to none of the load current, depending on how the house loads are balanced between the two 120V to neutral circuits.

You may not know it, but you are (in effect) indirectly touching the neutral wire hundreds of times a week.

If the system is just a two wire with a hot and neutral, the neutral would have all of the current of the hot (opposite direction flow) but the neutral should be near zero volts to Earth or ground. If it is a three wire system with neutral like a house, the neutral still is very near zero voltage to ground but could have anywhere from zero to full current depending on load balance between the hots (the hots are out of phase). If the neutral is not near zero volts to ground, it is a safety issue. :)

The American home ties the neutral and a small "safety ground" to Earth at one point, the mains box. The small safety ground is the little bare wire in the standard cable, and is not designed to handle much current. It connects to the wall plate screws, metal wall plates, light fixture metal, and cabinets of electronics like a desk computer. So all that metal in the room eventually ties to the neutral at the fuse box. Even your telephone and cable TV cable tie to that same neutral point!

 

[sophiecentaur]

we say that one wire is live and other is neutral.

They are only 'names'. As far as the appliance is concerned, the two wires do exactly the same job all the time.
It is only the Potential Difference between the wires that counts when you are using the electrical Power. It just so happens (for completely different reasons) that the Neutral conductor is kept with its Potential Difference to Earth near zero. As a consequence, the PD relative to ground of the other (live) wire goes positive and negative.

So when A is positive current will flow through one wire and when B is positive then current will flow through the other wire

No. The same 'amount of' current is flowing through each wire it's just flowing in different directions. The Earth / Ground wire never carries any of the supply current (except when there is a fault condition).
This is just the same as when you connect up a battery and a bulb; the same current flows into the - terminal of the battery as flows out of the + terminal.

Your concept is correct.

The neutral is called such because of the voltage to earth, not because of current. The same is true of "balanced" or "unbalanced" transmission lines. The balance or unbalance is determined by potential to Earth or surrounding space, although it becomes more complex than "neutral" because balanced also can mean currents are equal and out-of-phase.

You should be careful about what you are saying here. I'm not sure what your message is but it could be read as implying that the currents in live and neutral are not the same at all times - which is not true (except when something's wrong with the system).

 

[Tom Rauji]

You should be careful about what you are saying here. I'm not sure what your message is but it could be read as implying that the currents in live and neutral are not the same at all times - which is not true (except when something's wrong with the system).

Yes, it is difficult to be perfectly clear at every level. I assume people understand current around a two terminal path is the same value at every point and the wording just may be a little sloppy.

For example, this corrective statement is not true:

currents in live and neutral are not the same at all times - which is not true (except when something's wrong with the system).

That correction isn't true. In a perfectly functioning USA home system with zero reactance in the loads, the feeder neutral can actually have any current up to the difference in current between the two hot wires. If one hot is 75 amps and the other 35 and the system is perfect with zero power factor and no leakage currents, the neutral exiting the box to pole will be at 40 amperes. If the load is perfectly balanced, neutral current is zero at the service entrance.

This is more involved than a couple posts to get interpretation error free. It actually would take a few pages of text and drawings. The short form is the house is a center tapped power and load system, with a grounded center tap. That center tap is called a neutral, not because of current, but because of voltage with respect to the earthing or ground system. The neutral from pole to mains box almost never carries the same current as the hot wires, because the hots are 180 out-of-phase and the load is split between hots with the center of the split going to neutral.

The only universal statement we can make about the neutral is the neutral should always be at a very low voltage (within a few volts) of Earth anywhere in the system. The fact voltage is at or near neutral to Earth is the sole reason it is called "neutral". A neutral in a perfectly functioning USA power mains can have any amount of current, since it is the center tap return of a 240 volt center tapped winding and load.

 

[sophiecentaur]

I agree with you but with one proviso. People mostly post questions about the live and neutral wires that feed their appliances. The answer follows k1.
For people who want to know about polyphase systems, the answers are not so simple. IMO, one absolutely has to make it clear when a post goes polyphase. Many questioners are hardly aware about the ramifications of the US two phases in the home or the three phase system used for distribution.
School level is always (?) single phase.

 

[Tom Rauji]

I agree with you but with one proviso. People mostly post questions about the live and neutral wires that feed their appliances. The answer follows k1.
For people who want to know about polyphase systems, the answers are not so simple. IMO, one absolutely has to make it clear when a post goes polyphase. Many questioners are hardly aware about the ramifications of the US two phases in the home or the three phase system used for distribution.
School level is always (?) single phase.

The house feed is single phase. It is a single phase center tapped 240 volt winding. It is called single phase because it is one phase.

Distribution systems are three phase. In early two-phase systems, phase were in quadrature. The two phase 90 degree shift was improved to three phase, with 120 shift between phases. A standard US home in a populated area runs off one phase of three phase distribution, these lines typically are three hot primary wires up at the top with a neutral below. Each house typically feeds between one wire and the neutral. More rural areas with lighter loads have a single top hot wire and a neutral lower on the pole, with the transformer again between the hot wire and the street neutral.

A home 240 system is not polyphase or dual phase. It is single phase 240V center tapped.

 

[sophiecentaur]

. It is called single phase because it is one phase.

You could re-word that as "I call it".
If you refer the two 120V live wires to the Neutral, they are in antiphase (180°). Why is that not 'two phase' if 120° gives you three phase? The way it is produced is immaterial.

The UK uses single phase 240 V in all domestic situations. Now that really is single phase.

 

[jbriggs444]

You could re-word that as "I call it".
If you refer the two 120V live wires to the Neutral, they are in antiphase (180°). Why is that not 'two phase' if 120° gives you three phase? The way it is produced is immaterial.

The UK uses single phase 240 V in all domestic situations. Now that really is single phase.

It turns out that the term "two phase" is already spoken for. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-phase_electric_power

 

[sophiecentaur]

the term "two phase" is already spoken for.

As are the terms, wheel, modulation, drug and a few others. Unless there is something very singular about two sinusoids that are 180° out of phase, I would say that you can have two, quadrature phases, two phases at 50°, 75° or 179° and you would still have a two phase system.
Why not look at the OP and ask yourself whether these contributions to the thread could have helped or confused the questioner? I am as guilty as the next man (and you happen to be the next man, in this case) of adding superfluous information to a basically simple threads so mea culpa on many occasions.
AC means two wires to most people in this world and the thread was started on those lines. Historical names that were given to ways of producing electrical power aren't of great interest to modern school-level questioners.

Sorry. Reading this through again it looks far more harsh than I intended. Mea culpa all over again.

 

[jbriggs444]

Sorry. Reading this through again it looks far more harsh than I intended. Mea culpa all over again.

I agree that the discussion of mains power and of one, two or three phase is irrelevant to the original question. And that as the next man, I stand guilty as well.

 

[sophiecentaur]

No. I'm Spartacus.

 

[Buckleymanor]

AC means two wires to most people in this world and the thread was started on those lines. Historical names that were given to ways of producing electrical power aren't of great interest to modern school-level questioners.

To revisit the OP is the actual meaning of AC Alternating Current. Which is what the current does on the label and is why neutral can be as live as the positive when the current alternates.

 

[sophiecentaur]

To revisit the OP is the actual meaning of AC Alternating Current. Which is what the current does on the label and is why neutral can be as live as the positive when the current alternates.

They are carrying the same current but not normally at the same potential wrt Earth.

 

[123kid]

Thanks all of you. you have answered the question but my question was different.
I want to know that is there current flow in both hot (live) and neutral wire in our home ? or it is in single wire?
if we check neutral wire with tester, it will not show current.
But in AC current we study current changes direction. Also the polarity of terminals of AC source changes. Then according to this current mus flow in hot and neutral wire. Am i right ?

 

[sophiecentaur]

if we check neutral wire with tester, it will not show current.

That is not right. Your 'tester' will only respond to the Elecric Field near that wire; it is not a current meter. You could not measure the current except by breaking the circuit and inserting an Ammeter in series (or using a more modern 'tong' meter, which I doubt you have). If you had been able to measure the actual Current, then you would have found exactly the same value through the live and neutral wires. An AC source doesn't have a "polarity" because the PD across both terminals will alternate in sign at 50 (/60)Hz.
This has all been stated earlier on in this thread and your comments in #4 have been answered. Your last question is effectively just repeating your original question. Try to take on board what has been written already and don't try to impress your original ideas onto those answers. You need a re-think, if you want to get hold of this.
There is a lot of rubbish talked about AC (even in the hallowed walls of PF) and you need to be careful about what you take notice of.
A good textbook (not a technician's instruction manual - which can be surprisingly dodgy) should put you right, with this and most of elementary Physics ideas.

 

[123kid]

That is not right. Your 'tester' will only respond to the Elecric Field near that wire; it is not a current meter. You could not measure the current except by breaking the circuit and inserting an Ammeter in series (or using a more modern 'tong' meter, which I doubt you have). If you had been able to measure the actual Current, then you would have found exactly the same value through the live and neutral wires. An AC source doesn't have a "polarity" because the PD across both terminals will alternate in sign at 50 (/60)Hz.
This has all been stated earlier on in this thread and your comments in #4 have been answered. Your last question is effectively just repeating your original question. Try to take on board what has been written already and don't try to impress your original ideas onto those answers. You need a re-think, if you want to get hold of this.
There is a lot of rubbish talked about AC (even in the hallowed walls of PF) and you need to be careful about what you take notice of.
A good textbook (not a technician's instruction manual - which can be surprisingly dodgy) should put you right, with this and most of elementary Physics ideas.

I am not trying to impress my ideas on any thing. I am just trying to remove my confusion. All the answers which are given to the thread, may be are correct and give the correct answers, difficult for me to understand. That's why i questioned again. I don't know what makes you feel that i am impressing you.

 

[sophiecentaur]

I am not trying to impress my ideas on any thing.

Bad wording on my part but you are not letting the new information you are being given help you overcome your intuition. You are confusing Volts with Current, I think. You cannot measure current easily so I was assuming that your 'tester' was a normal mains tester that just looks at volts. Your conclusion that the currents are different (on the strength of your evidence) is not founded on any evidence. Does that make sense?

 

[russ_watters]

I'm sorry I didn't see this thread before because there is too much off-topic discussion that makes it confusing and some of the on-topic responses just aren't correct. I'll re-focus:

But my question is that, how one wire is neutral. As we say that in AC current, the terminals change the polarity. Its mean that some time A will be positive and some time B will be positive. So when A is positve current will flow through one wire and when B is positive then current will flow through the other wire.

None of that is correct.

The "neutral" wire is so-called because that's exactly what it is: neutral. It is connected to the ground and therefore its voltage with respect to the ground is always (supposed to be) just about zero. The "hot" or "live" wire has an oscillating voltage with respect to this constant neutral: sometimes positive, sometimes negative. It pulls and pushes the electrons through the circuit.

A properly functioning neutral should not electrocute you because it doesn't carry a voltage with respect to the ground: it is "after" the load regardless of the direction of current flow, so it requires nearly zero voltage to push/pull current through it (but for safety reasons, you still should not touch it).

But the circuit is still a single loop, regarless of which direction the current is flowing. The live wire is pulling or pushing the current through the circuit, but in all cases, the current is the same everywhere in the circuit (it has nowhere else to go).

[later post] I want to know that is there current flow in both hot (live) and neutral wire in our home? or is it in single wire?
if we check neutral wire with tester, it will not show current.

Hopefully my above addresses most of what is wrong with this (mainly that the current must always be the same everywhere in a circuit), but there is an additional possible source of confusion: What kind of tester? Most people don't ever check the current in their homes because it is difficult and the equipment is expensive. They only ever measure voltage. So if you measure the voltage of the neutral with respect to ground, it will always be zero whereas (in the US) the hot is 120V. If you measure the current, it will always be the same in the neutral and hot wires.

So, some more specific issues:

To revisit the OP is the actual meaning of AC Alternating Current. Which is what the current does on the label and is why neutral can be as live as the positive when the current alternates.

No! The hot/live wire is not "positive", it is alternating between positive or negative. The netural wire is always zero, so it cannot ever "be as live as the [hot]".

I ignored most of the multi-phase discussion because it isn't relevant, but just to point out the difference between single and multi-phase, it is the neutral wire itself: multi-phase power doesn't have one. For split-phase (when using both) or three phase, both/all three wires are hot.

 

[123kid]

Your conclusion that the currents are different

how did you conclude that this is my conclusion?

 

[sophiecentaur]

how did you conclude that this is my conclusion?

Here

if we check neutral wire with tester, it will not show current.

If it will show no current in the neutral then there can be no current in the live either.

 

[Flakca]

The purpose of the neutral wire is to carry the "unbalance" of the load back to ground. I used to work as an electrician in the state of Alaska. There is an interesting story that will illustrate the first sentence. I went to a house where the owner complained that his TV had blown up and the motors on his furnace weren't turning correctly. A fan was turning backwards. Upon measuring the voltage in his house I found that some outlets showed 70 volts and some 150 volts. This is on a 120/240 single phase (60hz) system.
The problem? The neutral was dropped. A tree had broken the neutral line in a wind storm. The power conductors were still connected. So the unbalance of the load was being distributed by the neutral wire into the other consumers (devices) of power in the home. All of those problems were caused by losing the reference to ground. The devices that used more power or less power basically were sharing the left over power to the neutrals. It was a mess. One that was fixed by the power company coming out and reconnecting the neutral wire. If their was a proper ground at the panel it should have mitigated this problem, maybe even concealed it. But the grounds that were present in the house were not sufficient to allow the power to remain balanced. (This is also why I don't like the idea of tying the ground to a water pipe.)
Another example is found in three-phase power. Basically the normal three-phase power that I encountered were three 120v legs represented by Black, Red and Blue wires. They all shared one White neutral wire that carried back the unbalance of the load. It was able to do so because the three legs of power were out of phase with each other. We wired up a store with suspended ceiling "Troffer" lights, flourescents. There was an equal number of lights on each leg. When we disconnected the White (neutral) wire, nothing happened. The lights ran fine. Why? It is because the lights were in balance with each other.
The purpose of the neutral wire is to carry back the unbalance of the load. So in a normal (US) house of 120/240 volts single phase, if one of your hot wires is carrying 30 amps and the other is carrying 23 amps, then the neutral will have to be able to carry 7 amps to keep the system balanced.

 

[sophiecentaur]

The purpose of the neutral wire is to carry the "unbalance" of the load back to ground.

Now we're back in the distribution system, which is not what the OP was about. Just read the stuff that's been put on this thread about the neutral in a single phase system. Doesn't that show you that we have a long way to go before we can afford to stray into multi phase systems.
I suggest that someone starts a thread with the term 'The Neutral in Multiphase Systems' in the title. Then take all the stuff that confuses the beginner and post it there - arguments can be free and uninhibited without confusing people for whom the 'bell circuit' may be a challenge.
In a domestic appliance, there is no 'unbalanced current' the neutral current is exactly the same as the live current (or the RCD will blow!). Furthermore, the Neutral Never 'goes all the way back to the generator'. It just goes back to the last transformer in the chain.

 

[Flakca]

Some people learn better through stories. I am one of them. The real answer is that if a circuit is balanced, then the neutral is not needed. However I think you would find that a domestic appliance requires a neutral to operate. Actually the neutral may not go back to the last transformer in the chain. The electrical code requires that the neutral and ground be bonded in the breaker panel, which can shunt some part of the unbalance of the load into the ground rod.

 

[Flakca]

I suppose the most important thing is to discern the motive behind the question. The answer is YES both wires can carry current. You can be shocked and seriously injured by a circuit with the breaker off, if an unbalanced condition exists in the house and is returning on the neutral. So ALWAYS treat connected wires with respect and do not hold a wire in one hand and lean on a grounded surface with the other. An electrical shock can disrupt the hearts natural rhythm even at less than lethal amperage.

 

[sophiecentaur]

if a circuit is balanced,

If there are only two conductors to an appliance, how can the current not be balanced? If there is a leakage path then things can be different. But do you seriously think that was part of the OP's idea?

If you do not use a centre tap on the secondary of a 240 / 120V system then the potentials of the two arms can be anywhere, either side of a 'neutral'. I am familiar with the UK system (a straight 240 Live and Neutral) but find it hard to believe that a totally floating 240V system could be workable if the mean potential of the two conductors depended on the relative resistances of the loads on each leg to an 'Earth' / Neutral connection. It would be a sort of bridge circuit with unspecified potentials on each leg. Wow!

The answer is YES both wires can carry current.

In a simple system they have to. You are not making it easy for the OP by introducing exceptions to the basic idea of AC.

 

[Svein]

If you do not use a centre tap on the secondary of a 240 / 120V system then the potentials of the two arms can be anywhere, either side of a 'neutral'. I am familiar with the UK system (a straight 240 Live and Neutral) but find it hard to believe that a totally floating 240V system could be workable if the mean potential of the two conductors depended on the relative resistances of the loads on each leg to an 'Earth' / Neutral connection.

In Europe (at least in Norway), the classic Power distribution system is three-phase AC, no "Earth". "Protection Earth" is the responsibility of the Builder. Inside the house, all outlets are connected to two of the phases, there is no "Neutral". The potential between any phase and "Protection Earth" can be more or less anything. "Protection Earth" is supposed to stay more or less in the "center" of the three phases, but in practice it can be far off.

 

[puf_the_majic_dragon]

This was a great explanation for me: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/question-on-live-and-neutral-wire.825694/page-3#post-5192017

 

[sophiecentaur]

In Europe (at least in Norway), the classic Power distribution system is three-phase AC, no "Earth". "Protection Earth" is the responsibility of the Builder. Inside the house, all outlets are connected to two of the phases, there is no "Neutral". The potential between any phase and "Protection Earth" can be more or less anything. "Protection Earth" is supposed to stay more or less in the "center" of the three phases, but in practice it can be far off.

I have to repeat my point that Neutral, for a normal domestic appliance, is the only other conductor to carry current but neutral in a multiphase system will not; it is far more complicated. There may or not be a neutral conductor involved. But all that is irrelevant to the OP and to most of the questions that appear on PF.
This thread reminds me of 'the sex talk' that the father gives his boy when asked "where did I come from?". He gives him the whole thing with all the nuts and bolts when all the boy wanted to know is where the hospital was that he was born in.