Does Flat Space Exist in the Context of General Relativity?

AI Thread Summary
Flat space exists in the context of general relativity as a theoretical construct, but when mass is introduced, space becomes curved, affecting the movement of celestial bodies like Earth. The discussion contrasts Newton's postulates of space and time with Einstein's experimental approach, emphasizing that flat spacetime devoid of mass is a valid concept. However, special relativity's flat spacetime only serves as an approximation in limited regions. The idea that space and mass are intrinsically linked suggests that a universe without mass would also lack spacetime. Ultimately, discussions about empty universes are deemed irrelevant in the context of our mass-filled universe.
yuanwei
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For understand general relativity, they tell me, there have flat space, add a sun, the flat space changed to curved space, so the Earth move around. There has a question, if we admit mass, space , time is created, how could exist flat space? there have space-time and there have nothing?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Newton offered his famous postulates about time and space, and they served well for hundreds of years. Einstein came along and removed the taste of philosophy from them, and appealed to experiment. "Time is what a clock measures." So I suppose the answer to your question is: "Space is what a ruler measures."
 
Yes, according to general relativity, spacetime that is flat everywhere has nothing in it. Special relativity in which spacetime is flat and has stuff in it only holds as an approximation over small regions of spacetime.
 
I think space-time is same with mass, so there have nothing means there have no space-time.
 
That would be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach_principle" in Bondi's classification. Personally I think it is a fairly useless principle, as are many of the Mach Principles. In this universe there is mass so any discussion of an empty universe is irrelevant to this one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top