Does Light Frequency Change When Entering a Solid?

AI Thread Summary
When light enters a solid, its wavelength changes, but its frequency remains constant. In the discussion, a light wave with a wavelength of 678 nm in air was incorrectly calculated due to a conversion error; the correct wavelength is 6.78e-7 m. The speed of light in the solid was calculated as 2.18e8 m/s using the correct frequency of 4.42e16 Hz. The confusion arose from the assumption that the frequency might change, but it does not when transitioning between media. Accurate unit conversion is essential for solving such problems correctly.
Mohji
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A light wave has a 678 nm wavelength in air. Its wavelength in a transparent solid is 493 nm.

a) What is the speed of light in this solid?
b) What is the light's frequency in the solid?

Homework Equations



v = λf

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I got the correct answer for this one. Let v1 and λ1 be speed of light and wavelength in air, v2 and λ2 in solid.

v1 = λ1f
f = v1 / λ1
f = (3.00e8 m/s) / (6.78e-9 m)
f = 4.42e16 Hz

v2 = λ2f
v2 = (4.93e-9 m) (4.42e16 Hz)
v2 = 2.18e8 m/s

This is the correct answer.

b) I was under the impression that the frequency of light does not change from one medium to another, meaning it would still be 4.42e16 Hz. This is the principle that I used to solve a). However, the online assignment keeps telling me that the answer is incorrect.

Am I making a mistake here? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mohji said:
v1 = λ1f
f = v1 / λ1
f = (3.00e8 m/s) / (6.78e-9 m)
f = 4.42e16 Hz

You made a mistake here, the wavelength 678 nm is 6.78 e-7 m, so your frequency is wrong.

And you are right, the frequency does not change when the light wave enters into an other medium.

ehild
 
ehild said:
You made a mistake here, the wavelength 678 nm is 6.78 e-7 m, so your frequency is wrong.

And you are right, the frequency does not change when the light wave enters into an other medium.

ehild

D'oh! Always overlook the possibility of something small like a conversion error. Thanks a lot for the quick reply.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top