Does maxwell equation means waves travelling from future to the present?

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's equations remain unchanged when time is replaced with its negative, but this does not imply retro-causality, as the speed of propagation remains constant. The discussion references the Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory, highlighting its relevance to the topic. It emphasizes that Maxwell's equations are incomplete without boundary conditions, which incorporate causality into the wave equation. Advanced solutions may be mathematically interesting but do not represent physical reality. Overall, the conversation underscores the importance of boundary conditions in understanding wave propagation and causality.
lookaround9
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
restrocausality like the TI intepretation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maxwell's equations don't change if we replace time by its negative. This doesn't imply
retro-causality ; the speed of propogation is constant.
 
Do you know http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%E2%80%93Feynman_absorber_theory" ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maxwell's equations are incomplete without boundary conditions.
Causality is put in as a physical boundary condition in solving the wave equation.
Advanced solutions are also useful mathematically, but not as the physical result.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top