Does Monotone Convergence imply Convergence Subsequence?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of monotone sequences and their convergence, specifically exploring whether monotone convergence implies the convergence of subsequences. The original poster presents a statement regarding the behavior of increasing sequences and their subsequences in terms of convergence.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove that if an increasing sequence diverges, then all its subsequences must also diverge. They question the necessity of the monotonicity condition in their reasoning.
  • Some participants point out that divergence can occur in forms other than tending to infinity, such as oscillation.
  • Another participant suggests that proving the sequence is bounded may be a valid approach to establish convergence.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of divergence and convergence. Some guidance has been offered regarding the boundedness of sequences, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's argument.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses confusion about the role of monotonicity in their proof and the implications of their findings. There is an acknowledgment of the need to clarify definitions and properties related to convergence.

annoymage
Messages
360
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Results

i) if (a_n) tends to L as n tends to infinity, then a_{n_r} tends to L as r tend to infinity

ii)if (a_n) tends to infinity as n tends to infinity, then a_{n_r} tends to infinity as r tend to infinity

using this result prove that

if (a_n) is an increasing sequence, prove that the converse of i) is true
Suppose (a_n) is divergent, then by ii), all the subsequences must be divergent, so, cant.

therefore (a_n) must be convergent, means (a_n) tends to M for some M,

apply i), then means M=L

but how come i didn't use the fact (a_n) is monotone, must be something wrong somewhere, help T_T
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Tends to infinity" is not the only way a sequence can diverge. Oscillating sequences are also divergent.
 
aaaaaaaaaaaarghh, yes yes, thank you ^^

hmm, now i have to prove that <br /> (a_n)<br /> is convergent,

i suspect i should prove that <br /> (a_n)<br /> is bounded then, i know <br /> (a_n)<br /> is monotone then, <br /> (a_n)<br /> must be converging right? then continue like i was doing above right?
 
Last edited:
That sounds correct.
 
thank you very much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K