Does net charge affect resistance?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the net charge of a cable influences its resistance. One argument suggests that a negatively charged cable could have lower resistance due to increased charge carriers, while another counters that additional particles may lead to increased scattering, raising resistance. The concept of linearity is also mentioned, proposing that the superposition of charges might not impact current flow. The feasibility of creating a "charged cable" using a Van de Graaff generator is explored, questioning if resistance measurements would change when the generator is activated. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of charge effects on resistance and suggests consulting existing threads on high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission for further insights.
greypilgrim
Messages
579
Reaction score
44
Hi.

Is the resistance of a charged cable different compared to a cable with zero net charge? If it is charged negatively, one could argue that now there are more carriers for the current, so the resistance should be smaller (similarly to water that becomes more conductive if ions are added). On the other hand, more particles might increase scattering which should increase resistance.

Or can we just argue that by linearity, this superposition of charges doesn't affect the current at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you propose to create a "charged cable"?
 
For example by connecting it to a Van de Graaff generator?

Ok the capacity of a cable is quite small, so let's use the generator directly: If the resistance of the sphere is measured between two opposite points on the surface, will it change if the generator is turned on? Of course under the assumption that the static electricity doesn't affect the measurement device directly.
 
greypilgrim said:
For example by connecting it to a Van de Graaff generator?
So you basically want a cable with a high voltage bias? In that case @anorlunda is the one to ask. Also look for a recent thread mentioning HVDC transmission.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top