I Does slowing light with a BEC change any of its properties?

AamsterC2
Messages
51
Reaction score
4
So I understand that scientists have been able to slow light to extremely low speeds using Bose-Einstein Condensates and even without them (https://physics.aps.org/story/v3/st37) and if I understand this correctly they slow light the same way water or air does; atoms absorb the photons and re-emit them which makes it take longer for the light to travel through the substance. My question is, does this process change the frequency or wavelength of the light while it is moving through, or after it has fully passed through the BEC? My assumption is that being slowed to such a degree in the condensate would possibly change some of the lights properties temporarily or that some amount of energy is lost to the substance as heat which would change the wavelength of the light
 
  • Like
Likes ISamson
Physics news on Phys.org
ZapperZ said:
Read this from 10 years ago:

https://www.photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=28520

Zz.
That just gives me a runtime error both on internet explorer and google chrome. Is the link correct?
 
AamsterC2 said:
That just gives me a runtime error both on internet explorer and google chrome. Is the link correct?

It works for me!

Zz.
 
Zz's link works on Firefox for me too.
 
ZapperZ said:
It works for me!

Zz.
Ok, it worked this time (not sure why it didn't at first). That article is absolutely amazing, I mean my mind is being blown right now whoa. And although the topic was slightly different I'm guessing from that the wavelength and frequency of the light when it comes out is the same as when it went it, the light itself is just a little weaker (unless that is only caused when the light is stored in the crystal)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top