Does the Object on the Table Have Wheels?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining whether an object moving at 2 m/s across a 1m table has wheels, based on its ability to stop without falling off. The key concepts involve the coefficient of friction and kinetic friction, which are essential for analyzing the object's motion. Relevant equations include the frictional force equation F_fric = μ * F_n and the force equation F = ma, where μ represents the coefficient of friction and F_n is the normal force. By calculating the acceleration and using these equations, one can deduce the coefficient of friction to assess if the object likely has wheels. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
nickthrop101
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An object is moved with a speed of 2m/s on one side of a 1m table to the other, it stops right at the other and of the table without falling off. Does it have wheels or not?

Homework Equations



The teacher gave this just to me and said we havnt learned about it yet but wanted to challenge me. I think it has something to do with the coefficient of friction and kinetic friction

The Attempt at a Solution


i don't want to be given an answer but just the relevant equations and how to use them thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be able to find the equation for coefficient of friction on the internet, plus approximate values for coefficient of friction for different surfaces/situations.

The equation is simple enough:

F_{fric} = \mu * F_n
mu is your coefficient of friction
F_n is your normal force (in this case, the force of gravity)

If you can figure out your acceleration, then you have another way to figure out your force of friction:
F=ma

Between those two equations, you should be able to solve for your coefficient of friction and check the internet to see if that's a reasonable value for wheels or no wheels.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top