laymanB
- 170
- 24
@nomadreid , as you can see from reading through this thread and the reply posts above, acceleration is not needed to explain the differential aging. The important thing to remember is that any proper analysis will come up with the same results. With that being said, personally I think some ways are simpler than others to analyze the problem, based on how it is presented. With the standard twin paradox problem setup, the easiest way for me to analyze it is to say that the space twin is the only one of the two twins to feel an acceleration, therefore we know that his worldline is not a straight line in flat spacetime between the two events. And because a straight worldline between two events in flat spacetime has the longest proper time, ergo; the Earth twin will have aged more. But if you present the solution like that then people come away thinking that the acceleration is necessary to explain the differential aging.
Don't worry if you still don't have a rock solid intuition about the asymmetry, you are in good company. I have read through many forums where people seem to know GR very well, claim that it requires acceleration and GR, work out the equations, and still come to the faulty conclusion that the problem is symmetric without someone experiencing acceleration.
Don't worry if you still don't have a rock solid intuition about the asymmetry, you are in good company. I have read through many forums where people seem to know GR very well, claim that it requires acceleration and GR, work out the equations, and still come to the faulty conclusion that the problem is symmetric without someone experiencing acceleration.