Does there exists a quadratic function for every parabola?

ritwik06
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
SOLVED

Homework Statement



While going through a question, I came across a function f(x)=5^{x}+5^{-x}
I saw its graph through a software. It was a parabola with minimum value 2.

Now a question arises in my mind.
Every function of the type g(x)=ax^{2}+bx+c is a parabola.
Can I assume the corollary to be true, that is for every parabola, there exists a quadratic function??
If yes, how may I find the coefficients a,b,c such that f(x)=g(x) ?



The Attempt at a Solution


There is only one thing that I see-
\frac{-\Delta}{4a}=2


Can this be solved?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


3. The Attempt at a Solution
For f(x)
if x=0, f(x)=2
if x=1, f(x)=5.2
if x=-1, f(x)=5.2
And if I use these equations to solve for the quadratics to solve for a,b,c the coefficients of g(x), I find that a=3.2, b=0, c=2.
which makes g(x)=3.2x^{2}+2 But the graph for this does not exactly coincide with f(x). Why??
Somebody Please help me.
 
Last edited:


Th graph of

<br /> 5^x + 5^{-x}<br />

is not exactly a parabola, so your attempt simply gives an approximation of this function and its graph, but will not duplicate it.
 


statdad said:
Th graph of

<br /> 5^x + 5^{-x}<br />

is not exactly a parabola, so your attempt simply gives an approximation of this function and its graph, but will not duplicate it.

What is the definition of parabola?
 


A parabola is the graph of a function that has the form

<br /> f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c<br />

If you graph

<br /> x = ay^2 + by + c<br />

you get a parabola shape, but this is not a function.

The equation you encountered (and its graph) are a form of a catenary . The classical equation for this graph involves the hyperbolic cosine (\cosh), or exponentials base e, but the form you give works as well. A catenary can be loosely described as the shape a hanging chain takes (or the graph of power lines between towers).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top