Does Work Depend on the Displacement of an Object?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cp255
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evaporation Heat
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether work is involved in the process of water evaporating into steam. The consensus is that while evaporation requires energy, it does not involve work since there is no displacement of the water itself. In contrast, compressing air with a bicycle pump involves a force acting over a distance, thus qualifying as work. The distinction is made clear that work is defined as force applied over a distance, and without displacement, no work is done. Ultimately, the focus is on understanding the specific conditions under which work is defined in physics.
cp255
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For which process does the system absorb energy in the form of work?
a) Water Evaporates into steam.
b)Air is compressed by a bicycle pump.
c) Both


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I though the answer was both. However, the key says the correct answer was just B. Why would it not be A as well? I thought evaporation required the input of energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work is a specific form of energy. While (a) needs energy, it will not use work.
 
I was thinking that maybe although the energy went into the steam they system is the water which would have cooled.
 
Usually the water will cool down, indeed.
 
So what exactly is work then?
 
Work
A force acting over some displacement. There is no such force or displacement involved in evaporation.
 
cp255 said:
So what exactly is work then?

Force applied over some unit of distance. If you push against a car and it moves, you've done work.

If you push on a wall, and the wall doesn't move or fall over, then you've done no work. The displacement of the wall here is 0. Now if the wall does fall over then you've done work. Good work!

(Or bad)
 
Back
Top