Does y(x,t) Satisfy the One-Dimensional Wave Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheTourist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transverse Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on verifying if the given transverse traveling wave equation y(x,t) = 0.6exp(2x-5t)cos(5t-2x) satisfies the one-dimensional wave equation. Participants are clarifying the correct interpretation of the wave function, particularly the role of the amplitude A and the confusion arising from the terms involving x and t. The wave equation to be satisfied is defined as ∂²y/∂x² = (1/v²)∂²y/∂t². The conversation emphasizes the need to differentiate y(x,t) twice with respect to both x and t to confirm compliance with the wave equation. Ultimately, the focus is on understanding the mathematical relationships within the wave function.
TheTourist
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
A transverse traveling wave is described by

y(x,t) = 0.6exp(2x-5t)cos(5t-2x)​

for x and y measured in centimeters and t in seconds.
Show that y(x,t) satisfies the one-dimensional wave equation.

I think that I have to show that y(x,t)=f(x+/-vt) where f is a funtion of x and t. Am I correct in calling A=0.6exp(2x-5t) or is it A=cos(5t-2x), because the reversal of the x and t values in the second case is confusing me. Any pointers on where to begin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The one-dimensional wave equation is \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2} = \frac{1}{v^2}\frac{\partial^2y}{\partial t^2}.

See how you get on, knowing this.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top