Why Does Distance Not Affect Frequency in the Doppler Effect?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Doppler effect and its relationship with frequency perception as a police car approaches and overtakes a criminal's getaway car. The Doppler formula indicates that frequency changes based on the relative velocities of the source and listener, but distance does not factor into the frequency calculation. When the police car is side by side with the criminal, the frequency heard is 400Hz due to the lack of a directional component in their velocities. The transition of frequency from above to below 400Hz occurs instantaneously as the police car overtakes the criminal, highlighting the discontinuous nature of relative velocity. Overall, the key takeaway is that while distance does not affect frequency, the direction of motion relative to each other is crucial in determining the observed frequency.
JeremyG
Messages
62
Reaction score
16
Hi all, I was just thinking about the Doppler effect today and I was wondering why distance between the source and listener does not affect the frequency experienced by the listener.

Consider the Doppler formula: fL = fS*(v+vL)/(v+vS), with the positive direction taken from listener to source

and the following situation: Police car with siren driving at a speed of 20m/s behind a criminal getaway car moving at a speed of 15m/s (Police car is behind the criminal's car at this point in time, and frequency of siren emitted by police car is 400Hz). As the police car catches up to the criminal, the frequency heard by the criminal will be shifted above 400Hz, from the Doppler formula.

The opposite effect occurs after the police car catches up to the criminal and is now in front of the criminal (Assume that both cars still travel at their constant velocities). That is, the frequency heard by the criminal will now be less than 400Hz.

What is confusing me is when this transition from >400Hz to <400Hz occurs if both cars are always traveling with different velocities. As the police car catches up to the criminal, from the formula it seems that up till the point that the police car overtakes the criminal, the criminal hears a constant >400Hz frequency siren.

What happens when the police car is side by side with the criminal car? What frequency does the criminal hear then? 400Hz?

Then when the police car overtakes the criminal car, all of a sudden the criminal hears a <400Hz frequency siren? Which then remains constant as the police car travels further and further from the criminal car? That just seems non-intuitive to me. Could it be a logic flaw, or a wrong application of the Doppler formula?

I would appreciate any help in aiding my understanding for this topic! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ratio of observed to emitted frequency is ##\frac{c+v_r}{c+v_s}## where ##c## is the speed of sound, ##v_r## is the speed of the receiver (hearer) through the air and ##v_s## is the speed of the source (emitter/siren) through the air. Location and separation do not appear in this formula, so they have no effect.
JeremyG said:
What happens when the police car is side by side with the criminal car? What frequency does the criminal hear then? 400Hz?
Yes, when the police car pulls alongside the pursued car. A more accurate description of the above formula is that ##v_r## and ##v_s## are the components of the velocities of receiver and source in the direction of the vector connecting the two. In that case, relative location does matter, but only from the point of view of relative direction, not relative distance.

When the police car is alongside, the velocities have zero component in the direction of the vector between the two cars, so there is no Doppler effect.

We all observe this last feature when an ambulance rushes by. The observed frequency ratio smoothly but rapidly changes from the above formula to its reciprocal as the ambulance passes us. The change appears to happen in a second but actually it is an asymptotic transition at both ends.
 
What you have to consider is the the relative velocity is itself discontinuous. As the police car catches the getaway car, the relative velocity (##v_L - v_S = v##) goes through zero to ##-v##. Only for an infinitesimal instant is it zero, for which indeed there would be no Doppler effect.

Note also that this is strictly true only in 1D. In reality, as the police car gets closer, the relative velocity will vary smoothly as the police car swerves not to collide with the getaway car.
 
andrewkirk said:
the velocities have zero component in the direction of the vector between the two cars, so there is no Doppler effect.

DrClaude said:
What you have to consider is the the relative velocity is itself discontinuous.

Indeed, I have failed to consider that at the point where both cars are at the same position, there is no direction vector to speak of in a 1D situation. Thank you to both gentlemen! :D
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top