Double Integral: Finding Area of Paraboloid Beneath z=2

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
It's about finding the area of the paraboloid z=x²+y² beneath z=2. The area integral is

\int\int_{\{(u,v): u^2+v^2<2\}}\sqrt{1+4(u^2+v^2)}dudv

A polar change of variable seems to fits nicely:

=\int_0^{\sqrt{2}}\int_0^{2\pi}\sqrt{1+4r^2}rd\theta dr

Then the change of variable \xi=1+4r^2 brings the area to

2\pi\int_1^9\sqrt{\xi}\frac{d\xi}{8}=\frac{2\cdot 2 \pi}{3 \cdot 8}[\xi^{3/2}]_1^9=\frac{13\pi}{3}

Looks good?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You got the right answer. However, you lost a factor of two on the last line of math and somehow gained that factor of two back again to get the correct answer. Those equalities are not equalities as written.
 
Last edited:
My friends found the area by "setting" z=u²+v² and just evaluating

=\int_0^{2}\sqrt{1+4z}dz

They found 13/3 (with no pi). I really can'T find any kind of justification for this integral but they say this is how the teaching assistant did a similar problem.

Any ways, thanks for confirming D H.

Btw - I think I just spotted a mistake in my OP. Instead of

2\pi\int_1^9\sqrt{\xi}\frac{d\xi}{8}=\frac{2\pi}{3 \cdot 8}[\xi^{3/2}]_1^9=\frac{13\pi}{3}

it should be

2\pi\int_1^9\sqrt{\xi}\frac{d\xi}{8}=\frac{2\cdot 2 \pi}{3 \cdot 8}[\xi^{3/2}]_1^9=\frac{26\pi}{3}

(I edited the OP)
 
Last edited:
D H said:
You got the right answer. However, you lost a factor of two on the last line of math and somehow gained that factor of two back again to get the correct answer. Those equalities are not equalities as written.

Oh I see. Ok, we're back as 13/3, but with the right amount of two's in the last line.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top