Double slit experiment with a slit covered.

AI Thread Summary
A thin mica flake with a refractive index of 1.58 covers one slit in a double-slit experiment, causing the 7th bright fringe to shift to the central maximum. The path difference is calculated using the formula d = (n-1) * thickness, where n is the refractive index. The wavelength in mica is shorter than in air, which affects the calculation of thickness. The problem simplifies to finding the thickness that allows for 7 additional wavelengths compared to air. The solution involves using the adjusted wavelength in mica to determine the required thickness, which has been successfully solved.
Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


A thin flake of mica (n=1.58) is used to cover one slit of a double-slit arrangement.The central point on the screen is occupied by the 7th brigth fringe.If lamda = 550nm, what is the thickness of the mica?

Homework Equations


path difference d=(n-1)*thickness
d=7*lamda
snell's law?

The Attempt at a Solution


first, the paths above the glass must be the same.So they are not in consideration.
let l be the thickness of the glass,t be the length traveled by light in mica,x in air
The mica:
sinθ=nsin
sin∅=sinθ/n...(1)
sin∅=l/t..(2)

(1)/(2),
sinθ=nl/t...(3)

In the air:
sinθ=l/x...(4)
compare 4 and 3,
i came out, t=xn.

Then i started to consider the difference of wavelength,
because the wavelength in mica is shorter than in air.
I tried to subtract the sum of the pulses in air and mica and set it equals to 7 lamda,
but what came out is peculiar,
let m , n be the number of pulses in mica and air respectively,f=frequency
m=tf/v...(5)
n=xf/c..(6)
so...
m/n=nt/x
i suppose it being m/n = t/nx ...so that they can be canceled out...
Please help for this:((
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clara Chung said:

Homework Statement


A thin flake of mica (n=1.58) is used to cover one slit of a double-slit arrangement.The central point on the screen is occupied by the 7th brigth fringe.If lamda = 550nm, what is the thickness of the mica?

Homework Equations


path difference d=(n-1)*thickness
d=7*lamda
snell's law?

The Attempt at a Solution


first, the paths above the glass must be the same.So they are not in consideration.
let l be the thickness of the glass,t be the length traveled by light in mica,x in air
The mica:
sinθ=nsin
sin∅=sinθ/n...(1)
sin∅=l/t..(2)

(1)/(2),
sinθ=nl/t...(3)

In the air:
sinθ=l/x...(4)
compare 4 and 3,
i came out, t=xn.

Then i started to consider the difference of wavelength,
because the wavelength in mica is shorter than in air.
I tried to subtract the sum of the pulses in air and mica and set it equals to 7 lamda,
but what came out is peculiar,
let m , n be the number of pulses in mica and air respectively,f=frequency
m=tf/v...(5)
n=xf/c..(6)
so...
m/n=nt/x
i suppose it being m/n = t/nx ...so that they can be canceled out...
Please help for this:((
I have the feeling that they do not expect you to take into consideration refraction through the mica (how could you, you do not have an angle of incidence). I think you can safely neglect that and just consider an incident angle of zero in which case what you wrote in part 2 is all you need.
 
I don't quite like the way that this question is worded.
I think that it means that what was the 7th bright fringe becomes shifted into the central bright maximum.
Overall, I don't think that the appearance of the screen pattern would change.
Then the problem becomes to calculate the thickness of the mica in order for the
mica to contain 7 more wavelengths than would be contained in an equivalent thickness of air.
This should not be too difficult since you know that the wavelength in the mica = 5.5 * 10E-7 / 1.58.
as compared to 5.5 * 10E-7 in air.
 
thank you all :)) i have solved the problem :D
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top