Double Slit: Find Longest Wavelength

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the longest wavelength of light for a first-order maximum in a double-slit experiment with slits 1200nm apart, the relevant formula is sin(theta) = m(wavelength)/d. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the angle theta, as it cannot exceed ±90 degrees, which complicates the calculation. The book states the longest wavelength is 12nm, but participants question this, suggesting it may be incorrect due to a possible oversight in the calculation. The consensus is that the maximum wavelength should be slightly less than the slit separation, indicating a need to re-evaluate the provided answer. Overall, the conversation revolves around clarifying the correct application of the formula and the implications of the angle in determining wavelength.
SwAnK
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Question: Calculate the longest wavelength of light falling on double slits separated by 1200nm for which there is a first-order maximum. In what part of the spectrum is the light?

Answer in Book: 12nm

my problem: the formula i thought you would use is sin(theta) = m(wavelength)/d?? However you do not know an angle? any ideas??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course -\frac{\pi}{2} < \theta < \frac{\pi}{2}. Can you solve it now?
 
yeah i get what that means and that theta could not be greater then 90 or less then -90, so then how do i incorperate that into the equation? and get 12 nm?:confused:
 
Plugging theta in would give

\lambda _{max} \approx d

Which according to your book is wrong. I'm stunned. I suppose the answer in the book is wrong: they've forgotten the zeros.
 
so the biggest possible wavelength that could be created would be slightly under the width between the two slits?? and thanks a lot for your help:smile:
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top