How Does Glass Thickness Affect Fringe Shift in a Double-Slit Experiment?

AI Thread Summary
In a double-slit experiment using a helium-neon laser, a thin piece of glass with a refractive index of 1.50 is placed over one slit, resulting in a shift of the central point to what was previously the m = 10 dark fringe. The discussion questions the omission of Snell's law in the textbook, suggesting it simplifies the scenario by assuming perpendicular light traversal through the glass. The parallel sides of the glass mean that light rays exit at the same angle, causing a minimal displacement that makes the slits appear closer together. Although Snell's law could be considered, its impact on the overall outcome is negligible compared to other approximations in the experiment. The conversation encourages further exploration of the effects of glass thickness and refractive index on the results.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
A double-slit experiment is set up using a helium-neon laser (l = 633 nm). Then a very thin piece of glass (n = 1.50) is placed over one of the slits. Afterward, the central point on the screen is occupied by what had been the m = 10 dark fringe. How thick is the glass?

I have the solution's attached.

My question is: why does the textbook not use snell's law? Is it making the simplistic argument that light traverses the glass piece perpendicularly? Would the problem be somehow changed otherwise?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-07-24 at 6.37.50 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-07-24 at 6.37.50 PM.png
    25.7 KB · Views: 2,851
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically the text does not use Snells law because it has no effect on the outcome (well, any effect is smaller than the approximations already being used).

Recall that the two sides of the glass are parallel - so rays emerge at the same angle as the incident rays. The effect, therefore, is to displace the ray by a distance that depends on the thickness of the glass, making the slits appear closer together ... but you are told that the glass is very thin, so the displacement will be very small.

You can check this for yourself:
Repeat the calculation, taking snell's law into account, and see what difference it makes for glass thickness t and refractive index n. Then see what happens when you make the thickness very small compared with the other dimensions of the experiment.

The calculation already involves approximations, this one is small compared to the others.
 
Simon, could you draw me some form of diagram to help me visualize the variables I should take into account?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top