Draw Acceleration Vectors for Constant Velocity Diagram

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on drawing acceleration vectors for a diagram where a car moves with constant velocity. It clarifies that while the car's velocity is tangential during circular motion, the acceleration is directed inward toward the center of the circle (centripetal acceleration). When the car moves straight without turning, there is no acceleration since the velocity remains constant, leading to the conclusion that there would be no acceleration vectors at those points. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between net force and momentum, noting that without a net force, there is no change in momentum or acceleration. The conversation highlights the distinction between velocity and acceleration vectors in different motion scenarios.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
I need to draw the acceleration vectors for the following diagram:
http://home.earthlink.net/~urban-xrisis/phy001.gif

The velocity is constant.
I have already got some, but what if the acceleration constant? Like when the car is going straight without turning?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
well, what direction is the acceleration toward on the straight aways? what direction is the acceleration on the corner's.

if that is your velocity on the corner's, i think you're mistaken. the velocity is tangential to the curve in uniform circular motion. this means that your velocity at the very edge of the circle is directed down and up.

think about the momentum principle

dp = Fnet * dt

with both vectors, it's saying that the change in momentum, or acceleration, is pointing the same direction that the force is pointing.

i hope that helps and i addressed the right issue correctly!
 
I'm not quite sure I understand what you're saying. I know that the velocity vector is tangent to the circle, but I'm looking for acceleration vectors. On the circle, the acceleration is inwards, towards the center of the circle (centripetal acceleration). However, on the side where the car is going straight, there is not acceleration, the velocity is constant. So my question is, would there even be acceleration vectors at points 2 and 4?
 
UrbanXrisis said:
I'm not quite sure I understand what you're saying. I know that the velocity vector is tangent to the circle, but I'm looking for acceleration vectors. On the circle, the acceleration is inwards, towards the center of the circle (centripetal acceleration). However, on the side where the car is going straight, there is not acceleration, the velocity is constant. So my question is, would there even be acceleration vectors at points 2 and 4?

if there is no net force acting on the car (ie its not accelerating), then there is no change in momentum, thus no vector. point 2, to me, looks like it's part of the circular section. in that case i would think that the acceleration vector points towards the center of the semicircle.

sorry, i thought you were saying those were velocity vectors that you had drawn in!

edit: keep in mind that there are external forces working on the car, which you may or may not want to include in your system. if no force is applied by the car to the track, it will actually be accelerating in the negative direction.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top