Drawing a free body diagram problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around drawing a free-body diagram for a 4.80 kg bucket of water being accelerated upward by a cord with a breaking strength of 86.0 N. The weight of the bucket is calculated to be 47.04 N, and participants clarify that the tension vector should be longer than the weight vector in the diagram. The breaking strength of 86 N is noted as relevant for determining the maximum upward acceleration before the cord fails. Participants confirm the correct application of Newton's second law, emphasizing the need to use the correct mass of the bucket in calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately representing forces in the free-body diagram.
Chandasouk
Messages
163
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 4.80 kg bucket of water is accelerated upward by a cord of negligible mass whose breaking strength is 86.0 N.

Draw the free-body force diagram for the bucket.
Draw the force vectors with their tails at the dot. The orientation of your vectors will be graded. The exact length of your vectors will not be graded but the relative length of one to the other will be graded.


Okay, I calculated the weight of the bucket of water which is w = -47.04N . If I were to make a free body diagram, the vector of w would be smaller than that of the Tension correct? Am I supposed to do something with the 86 N they gave me?

\SigmaFy = 86N + -47.04N = 38.96N

In this case, the vector of w would be longer than that of tension?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the weight vector should be shorter than the tension vector. I don't know why they give you 86N breaking point, unless there is more to the problem? It is not required to analyze the situation qualitatively.

Is there another part that asks you to find the maximum upward acceleration before the rope breaks?
 
Last edited:
Oh, wow, yeah. It says

Apply Newton's second law to the bucket and find the maximum upward acceleration that can be given to the bucket without breaking the cord.


I didn't see it until I scrolled down.

I know I have to use F=ma, but would I do

38.96N=18kg*a ?
 
Haha nice.

You know that the force of gravity is 47.04N downwards and the maximum tension force is 86N. Because the initial 47.04N is required to counter gravity, the rest of that 86N causes your upward acceleration. You calculated 38.96N correctly, just remember that the mass of the bucket is 4.8kg not 18kg.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top