Drawing distribution curves for orbitals

Chemer
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi, can anyone please guide me how to draw the distribution curves for radial wave function of an orbital? Please explain stepwise and in easy way.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you be more specific ? Is this about hydrogen-like potentials or something else ?
And "distribution curves" ?
 
In quantum mechanics, my textbook has this question:
"Draw the distribution curves for radial wave function of 1s,2s,3s orbitals."
Distribution curve is "The probability density of finding an electron in polar coordinates."
 
Good. sounds like hydrogen-like potentials. What are the wavefunctons ? What have you got in your toolbox to deal with this exercise ? And how far did you get in your attempt at solution ?

Homework Statement

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Well, there are no values given in the question. I'm just a beginner in quantum mechanics and am not good at graph plotting but I'll try with your guidance:)

The graph is between radius;the distance of orbital from the nucleus and 4πr2 (psi)2, I think the probability density? Now how to plot the graph?
 
In the chapter where your textbook has this question, did they solve the Schroedinger equation by separating variables (first time and position, later also ##r,\ theta, \ \phi## ) and come up with wave functions ? Then the core of this exercise is not how to handle pencil and paper, but how to interpret the wave function, in particular when it's been separated into radial and angular parts.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top