Solving Drive Train Problem with Friction Coefficient of 0.3

In summary, the conversation is about a problem from a physics textbook regarding a wheel driven by a motor. The wheel has a uniform thickness, a mass of 10kg, and a radius of 10cm. The motor is capable of delivering a torque of 5 Nm and is connected to the wheel through a belt. The problem asks how long it takes for the wheel to accelerate from rest to 100 rpm if the belt does not slip. Another part of the problem involves determining the tensions in the belt on both sides of the wheel if the coefficient of friction between the belt and wheel is 0.3. The participants discuss the concept of tension in a massless rope and how it relates to pulleys with and without friction
  • #1
ee7klt
10
0
Hi all,
I was wondering if someone could help me out on this (taken from Newtonian Mechanics, A.P. French, pg 705, problem14-23)

A wheel of uniform thickness , of mass 10kg and radius 10cm is driven by a motor through a belt. The drive wheel on the motor is 2cm in radius. The motor is capable of delivering a torque of 5 Nm.

A) Assuming that the belt does not slip on the wheel, how long does it take to accelerate the large wheel from rest up to 100 rpm?

B) If the coefficient of friction between belt and wheel is 0.3, what are the tensions in the belt on the two sides of the wheel?
(Assume that the belt touches the wheel over half its circumference.)

For A, I had that if the belt does not slip, all of the torque is transferred to the driven wheel and I applied torque = moment X angular acceleration. And alpha = omega X time assuming alpha is constant.

For B, I thought of deriving friction from the normal force exerted by circumference on belt, but this looks like a nightmare to compute since the force the belt exerts on the circumference varies over the circumference.

In any case, does not the tension In a massless rope have to the the same on both sides always? If not we get infinite acceleration in any given differential element!

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ee7klt said:
In any case, does not the tension In a massless rope have to the the same on both sides always? If not we get infinite acceleration in any given differential element!

thanks.

Welcome to PF ee7klt!

For a rotating massless pulley, [tex]\alpha \neq 0[/tex] but moment of inertia is zero as mass is zero. Hence, the tensions have to be same on either side of the pulley (you can see why this is so by making a freebody diagram of a pulley whose center of mass is attached to a rope the tension in which is T and which is wrapped by an inextensible rope--now find the tensions in either part of the rope using the idea just mentioned).

If however, friction exists, the analysis changes a bit (you have to consider an element of the rope), you have to use a relation involving the (different) tensions, T1 and T2 on either side of the pulley, the coefficient of static friction of the pulley-rope interface and the angle of wrap. Think about this.
 
Last edited:
  • #3


Hi there,

For part A, your approach is correct. The torque exerted by the motor is equal to the moment of inertia of the wheel times its angular acceleration. Since the wheel starts from rest, its initial angular velocity is 0 and we can solve for the angular acceleration. Then, using the formula for angular velocity, we can calculate the time it takes to reach 100 rpm.

For part B, you are correct that the tension in a massless rope or belt should be the same on both sides. This is because the rope or belt is considered to be infinitely thin and therefore does not have any mass to affect the tension. However, the tension in the belt will vary along its length due to the varying friction force between the belt and the wheel. To solve for the tensions on either side of the wheel, you can consider the forces acting on the belt (tension, normal force, and friction force) and use the coefficient of friction to calculate the friction force. Then, using the fact that the net force on the belt must be equal to its mass times its acceleration, you can solve for the tensions on either side of the wheel.

I hope this helps. Good luck with your problem!
 

1. How does a friction coefficient of 0.3 affect drive train problems?

A friction coefficient of 0.3 means that there is a moderate amount of friction between two surfaces. This can cause issues with the smooth operation of a drive train, as the friction can create resistance and decrease efficiency.

2. What are some common drive train problems that can arise from a friction coefficient of 0.3?

Some common drive train problems that can occur from a friction coefficient of 0.3 include excessive wear on moving parts, decreased power and speed, and increased energy consumption.

3. How can we solve drive train problems caused by a friction coefficient of 0.3?

One solution is to use lubricants or other methods to reduce the friction between surfaces. Another approach is to adjust the design of the drive train to minimize contact between surfaces.

4. Are there any benefits to a friction coefficient of 0.3 in a drive train?

While a friction coefficient of 0.3 can cause problems, it can also provide some benefits. It can prevent slippage between surfaces and provide stability and control in certain applications.

5. How can we accurately measure the friction coefficient in a drive train?

The friction coefficient can be measured by conducting controlled experiments and measuring the force required to overcome the friction between two surfaces. This can be done using specialized equipment such as a tribometer.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
3
Replies
102
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top