Dropping sand onto a conveyor belt

  • Thread starter Thread starter serverxeon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Belt Conveyor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of sand being dropped onto a conveyor belt, focusing on the power required to maintain constant velocity and the change in kinetic energy (KE) of the sand. The power supplied to the system is calculated as 2W, while the rate of change of KE for the sand is determined to be 1W. The discrepancy arises because the additional 1W is necessary to keep the conveyor belt moving at a constant speed despite the added mass of the sand. Without this extra energy, the belt would slow down as more sand accumulates. The conversation highlights the importance of energy transfer and the role of friction in the system's dynamics.
serverxeon
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Sand is placed onto a horizontal conveyor belt.
rate of sand placed = 0.5 kg s-1
velocity of conveyor belt = 2 m s-1

a) what is the power supplied by the system to keep the velocity constant?
b) what is the rate of change of KE by the sand
c) why is the answer in a and b different?

--------------------------

I know the answer to part (a) comes from
P = Fv = dp/dt * v = dm/dt * v2 = 2W

and the answer to part (b) is
just 1/2* (m/t) * v2 = 1W

my question is, where does the other 1W goes to?
2W is inputted, but only 1W goes into the KE of the sand!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the first is the total work for belt+sand, the second is just for the sand.
 
can u elaborate? why does the belt needs energy?
the before and after KE of the belt remains constant. no?
 
Can you think of anywhere else the energy can go?

without the extra energy, belt must go slower with extra mass on it, therefore it needs more energy to maintain it's speed. Try it with a moving plate instead of the belt, and you just drop one lump mass on it.
 
I understand where you are coming from.

But,

looking at the scenario of in one second, in the case where the motor to the belt is running,
Comparing the KE of the belt before and after, -> no change as the belt will remain at velocity v!
comparing KE of sand before and after -> gained 1J

Still does not account for the 2J put in by the motor per second!
 
Last edited:
serverxeon said:
I understand where you are coming from.

But,

looking at the scenario of in one second, in the case where the motor to the belt is running,
Comparing the KE of the belt before and after, -> no change as the belt will remain at velocity v!
comparing KE of sand before and after -> gained 1J

Still does not account for the 2J put in by the motor per second!

If the belt were frictionless the sand wouldn't move along with the belt. It would just sit where it was dumped while the belt slides underneath it. Does that give you a hint?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top