Help Solving Dynamics Problem: Skier Coasting Down Hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter lussi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a dynamics problem involving a skier coasting down a hill with specific angles and time intervals for each section of the slope. Participants clarify the equations used to determine the normal force and the skier's acceleration, emphasizing the importance of using the correct trigonometric functions for forces acting on the skier. The normal force is derived from the equation N1 = mgcosα, indicating that the gravitational force's component along the slope is crucial for calculating motion. Additionally, there is mention of using kinematics to solve for the skier's velocity and friction coefficient, with a suggestion to focus on force components. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding the relationships between forces, acceleration, and motion in dynamics problems.
lussi
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm studying for my exam and I don't understand the solution to a problem. I hope someone could help. It's actually for Dynamics.

problem: A skier coasts down a hill without initial velocity. The slope is at angle α = 30° with respect to the horizon from p. A to p. B. From p. B to p. C the track is with a reverse angle β = 10° with respect to the horizon. The skier stops at p. C. The motion time for section AB is t1 = 6s, and for section BC - t2 = 15s. Determine the friction coefficient μ between the skies and the snow, as well as the skier's velocity at p. B.

A part of the given solution is: m*y1 = 0 = N1 - m*g*cosα. And I thought that it should be the sin of the angle.

If you could actually explain the solution to the problem, I would really appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello lussi,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

lussi said:
I'm studying for my exam and I don't understand the solution to a problem. I hope someone could help. It's actually for Dynamics.

problem: A skier coasts down a hill without initial velocity. The slope is at angle α = 30° with respect to the horizon from p. A to p. B. From p. B to p. C the track is with a reverse angle β = 10° with respect to the horizon. The skier stops at p. C. The motion time for section AB is t1 = 6s, and for section BC - t2 = 15s. Determine the friction coefficient μ between the skies and the snow, as well as the skier's velocity at p. B.

A part of the given solution is: m*y1 = 0 = N1 - m*g*cosα. And I thought that it should be the sin of the angle.

There's some dimensionality issues with the equation, the way it written above. The left side of the equation is written in mass times distance, while the right side is force. Something about that isn't consistent.

Anyway, let's just take the right side of the equation:

0 = N1 - mgcosα.​
Rearranging,
N1 = mgcosα.​

That's the magnitude of the normal force. Finding the magnitude of the normal force is one step along the way to solving the problem.
 
lussi said:
I'm studying for my exam and I don't understand the solution to a problem. I hope someone could help. It's actually for Dynamics.

problem: A skier coasts down a hill without initial velocity. The slope is at angle α = 30° with respect to the horizon from p. A to p. B. From p. B to p. C the track is with a reverse angle β = 10° with respect to the horizon. The skier stops at p. C. The motion time for section AB is t1 = 6s, and for section BC - t2 = 15s. Determine the friction coefficient μ between the skies and the snow, as well as the skier's velocity at p. B.

A part of the given solution is: m*y1 = 0 = N1 - m*g*cosα. And I thought that it should be the sin of the angle.

If you could actually explain the solution to the problem, I would really appreciate it.

When you used the cos(a), maybe you were thinking of the component of the gravitational force along the direction of the downhill path? Concentrate on just one force component at a time, and take collinsmark's suggestion.

SkiProblem2_zps18cde3d5.png
 
Well, thank you for the quick answers. I've forgotten to write that y1 in the equation is a second derivative, i.e. the acceleration. In the book, it was written with 2 dots on top of y1.
 
lussi said:
Well, thank you for the quick answers. I've forgotten to write that y1 in the equation is a second derivative, i.e. the acceleration. In the book, it was written with 2 dots on top of y1.
Okay, so that's saying that the component of acceleration in the direction of the normal is 0, which makes sense.

However, the component of the acceleration parallel to the surface is not. So, you'll need to sum the force components along this direction, set that equal to ma_{\|}. Then kinematics can be used.*

*(If I'm not mistaken, there is an alternate way to solve the problem using conservation of energy instead kinematics. Either way though, you'll still need to calculate the force of friction, and that involves the magnitude of the normal force.)

[Edit: nevermind, about the conservation of energy. I think kinematics is the best approach.]
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top