How to Solve for the Electric Field Between Angular Plates?

AI Thread Summary
To solve for the electric field between two angular plates, the Laplace equation in cylindrical coordinates is necessary, particularly focusing on the angular component due to the plates' orientation. The boundary conditions specify that the potential is zero at one plate and a value V at the other. The discussion highlights the need to consider both the angular and radial components in the solution. Separation of variables is suggested, leading to the formulation of the potential as V(r, θ) = R(r)Θ(θ). The conversation emphasizes determining the angular function Θ and the eigenvalue λθ based on the given boundary conditions.
kargak
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
the electric field between two plates . plates have an angle with each other. first plate has zero potential and the second plate has a V potential.


i guess i must use laplace equation on cylndric coordinates but i couldn't find the answer.


http://img85.imageshack.us/i/adsztw.jpg/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like cylindrical Laplacian is necessary for this problem. What are your boundary conditions??
 
V=0 at angle=0
V=V(0) at angle=beta

all givens are : http://img85.imageshack.us/i/adsztw.jpg/
sylindrical laplacian's only teta part is not equal zero. i wrote it and couldn't get a meaning
 
You are correct about the boundary conditions, but there still can be a contribution from the radial component (you'll see why/how soon).

Clearly there is no z dependence so from separation of variables we can write V(r,\theta)=R(r)\Theta(\theta) (where 0\leq\theta\leq\beta) so that we get

\frac{\nabla^2V}{V}\rightarrow-\frac{r}{R}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left(r\frac{\partial R}{\partial r}\right)=\lambda_\theta=\frac{1}{\Theta}\frac{\partial^2\Theta}{\partial\theta^2}

So with the boundary conditions such that V(r,0)=0 and V(r,\beta)=V, what can you determine about the angular function, \Theta and the eigenvalue \lambda_\theta?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top