E-field of an ununiformly-charged rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter nahya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E-field Rod
AI Thread Summary
A particle with a mass of 5 g and a charge of -11 µC is moving in a uniform electric field of 450 N/C directed in the -y direction. The initial velocity is 35 m/s at a 25° angle above the x-axis. The calculated force acting on the particle is 0.00495 N, leading to an acceleration of 0.99 m/s². The x-coordinate at t = 5 s is determined to be 158.60 m, but there is confusion regarding the correct calculation of the y-coordinate due to the electric field's influence. The discussion also touches on a calculation error related to the conversion of units and the final answer needing to be expressed in N/C.
nahya
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
ballistic particle and electric field

Throughout space there is a uniform electric field in the -y direction of strength E = 450 N/C. There is no gravity. At t = 0, a particle with mass m = 5 g and charge q = -11 µC is at the origin moving with a velocity v0 = 35 m/s at an angle q = 25° above the x-axis.
---
i found out that the magnitude of the force acting on the particle is 0.00495 N.
the question is this: at t = 5 s, what are the x- and y-coordinatesof the position of the particle?
x: 158.60 m, but I'm having trouble finding out what the y-coordinate would be, because of the electric field present in the -y direction.

i tried this:
the initial velocity in the y diction is 35 sin 25'.
then, v_y = 35sin25 - at, where a = F/m. I've already found F, and m is given. so, a = 0.99
then, v_y = 35sin25 - 0.99t. plug in t, i get 9.8416. but that's wrong.
what am i doing wrong?

thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral is correct. How'd you get 7.2e10? K is of order e10 and A of the order e-6 so you should get something of the order e4.
 
doh! i forgot that A is in µC.
so... 2 * 9e9 * 4e-6 = 72000, and it's still wrong...
the answer's supposed to be in N/C.

edit:

oh. -72000. hehe.
thanks!
 
Last edited:
i'm recycling the thread. old post was edited to a new question.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top