E&M: Energy Transported over medium w/ total internal reflection

astrosag
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the case of total internal reflection, show that the average rate of energy transport across the boundary is zero.


Homework Equations


None Provided

The Attempt at a Solution



All that I have come to is that I should use some form of the following method to find the time average of a product:

<fg> = (1/2)Re<fg*> ...(fg on the RHS can have real and/or imaginary parts)

I am quite lost on this problem and have hit a brick wall for this homework problem. Any help is appreciated, thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
astrosag said:

Homework Statement


In the case of total internal reflection, show that the average rate of energy transport across the boundary is zero.


Homework Equations


None Provided

The Attempt at a Solution



All that I have come to is that I should use some form of the following method to find the time average of a product:

<fg> = (1/2)Re<fg*> ...(fg on the RHS can have real and/or imaginary parts)

I am quite lost on this problem and have hit a brick wall for this homework problem. Any help is appreciated, thank you.
The wave number in the material is purely imaginary for TIR,
so Re(E*B)=0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top