1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: E=mc^2 Derivation

  1. Jan 4, 2012 #1

    Is this derivation of E = mc^2 correct? ... I have some doubt at the red place ...

    [itex]\large{ F = \frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}(mv) }[/itex]

    [itex]\large{ F = v\frac{dm}{dt} + m\frac{dv}{dt} }[/itex]

    Let this force cause a displacement dx

    [itex]\large{ dW = F \cdot dx }[/itex]

    Assuming body was initially at rest and this work is converted into kinetic energy and increase it by dK

    [itex]\large{ dK = F\cdot dx }[/itex]

    [itex]\large{ dK = v\frac{dm}{dt}dx + m\frac{dv}{dt}dx }[/itex]

    [itex]\large{ dK = mvdv + v^2dm }[/itex] --- Equation 1

    Now using eqn

    [itex]\large{ m = \frac{m_o}{ \Large{ \sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}} } } }[/itex]

    Squaring both sides,

    [itex]\large{ m^2= \frac{{m_o}^2}{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}} }[/itex]

    [itex]\large{ m^2c^2 - m^2v^2 = {m_o}^2c^2 }[/itex]

    differentiating the expression

    [itex]\large{ 2mc^2dm - 2mv^2dm - 2vm^2dv = 0 }[/itex]

    [itex]\large{ c^2dm = mvdv - v^2dm }[/itex]

    Using this in eqn 1

    [itex]\large{ dK = c^2dm }[/itex]


    [itex]\large{ K = \int_0^K{dK} = \int_{m_o}^{m}{c^2dm} }[/itex] < --- HERE

    [itex]\large{ K = c^2(m - m_o) }[/itex]

    Total energy of body,

    [itex]\large{ E = K + m_o c^2 }[/itex]

    [itex]\large{ E = c^2(m - m_o) + m_o c^2 }[/itex]

    [itex]\large{ E = mc^2 = \frac{m_o c^2}{ \Large{ \sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}} } } }[/itex]

    Also [itex]\large{ K = E - m_o c^2 = (m - m_o)c^2 }[/itex]

    [itex]\large{ \Delta E = \Delta m c^2 }[/itex]
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 4, 2012 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    I think this step isn't right. Maybe you got the negative sign in the wrong place? Up until this bit, I'd say it was all correct.
  4. Jan 4, 2012 #3
    Oops ... it was a typo
    It would be ...

    [itex]\large{ c^2dm = mvdv + v^2dm }[/itex]

    What i was confused was that, we write E = mc2 and not moc2 because when moving mass increase, and that is a way of saying (if i'm not wrong) that KE of body adds to its mass.
    So is it ok for me to take limits as mo → m ?
    I mean, when i'm treating KE as separate and not a part of addition in mass, should i really take these limits? ... Well i know my these sentences are also against some steps of my derivation above ... but ,,, ummm,,, i dunno ,,, please help me get rid of my confusion ...

    [itex]\large{ K = \int_0^K{dK} = \int_{m_o}^{m}{c^2dm} }[/itex]
  5. Jan 4, 2012 #4


    Staff: Mentor

  6. Jan 4, 2012 #5


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Yes, I see it was simply a typo, and the rest of the derivation is correct :) (for 1-d motion, of course).

    m is the relativistic mass. m0 is the rest mass. So you can say that the KE of a body adds to its relativistic mass, but not to its invariant (rest) mass.

    And yes, those are the correct limits of integration, because when KE is zero, m=m0 (in other words, the only energy it has is rest energy).
  7. Jan 4, 2012 #6


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

  8. Jan 4, 2012 #7
    So you mean that, the integrated eqn of K accounts for change in mass, ... m-mo mass is added to the particle when it moves ...
    Well is makes sense now ... I don't know why i was thinking all that before ,,, thank you for your help BruceW !! :biggrin:
  9. Jan 4, 2012 #8


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    No worries. Practice makes perfect!
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook