Easy and quick Special Relativity before my exam

mewmew
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Well I am having my exam tomorrow over special and very basic general relativity. I have one area I am still a bit fuzzy on now that I look back at our last exam. I am confused on when you can use just Lorenz time dilation/length contraction to when you need to use the full Lorenz transformation.

For example: In one problem we were given a spaceship leaves Earth to a star distance x away(in the Earth reference frame), the spaceship has a velocity of y with respect to the earth. How long does it take to get to to asteroid in the Earth reference frame? The ships? This you can use simple time dilation.

Our next problem was: Frame S' has a speed of x relative to S, clocks are adjusted so that t'=t=0. A photon is emitted in S at x=0 and absorbed at x=50 m, what time does this event occur in S'? This you need to use the full Lorentz transformation.

I am sure it is pretty simple to understand when and why you can use one or the other but I am a bit confused. Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simple time dilation describes the behavior of a single moving clock. That applies perfectly to your first example (the spaceship's clock is that single moving clock), but not to the second. In the second example, no single clock times the emission and absorption of that photon: multiple clocks in each frame are needed to measure the travel time. That requires the full Lorentz transformations.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top