Easy: given theta, uncertainity on cos(theta)

  • Thread starter Thread starter thegame
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theta
AI Thread Summary
To find the uncertainty on cos(theta) given theta = 5 plus/minus 0.1 degrees, the uncertainty can be calculated using the formula |Δcos(theta)| = (sin(theta))(Δtheta). In a separate discussion about measuring pendulum oscillation time, it was noted that reaction time introduces uncertainty, contradicting the idea that uncertainty could be zero. Factors such as individual reaction times and measurement techniques significantly affect the overall uncertainty in timing. The discussion highlights that systematic errors and human factors can complicate measurements, suggesting that repeated trials may yield a more accurate uncertainty estimate. Overall, understanding uncertainty requires considering multiple variables beyond just reaction time.
thegame
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I need to find the uncertainty on cos(theta) given:
theta = 5 plus/minus 0.1 degrees

what is the uncertainty on cos(theta)? [propagation of error]

2)

Suppose I measured the time taken by the pendulum to complete one oscillation. So the pendulum moves downward and I start the stopwatch. Then the pendulum completes one oscillation and I stop the stopwatch.

Is the ucertainty 0? Let's say my reaction time is 0.17 sec. So, when I see the pendulum move down, I start the clock 0.17 seconds late (which is the time taken by the brain to intrepret the signal). And at the end, I stop the pendulum 0.17 seconds later after the event has occured...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\Delta \cos\theta =\cos(\theta +\Delta\theta)-cos\theta=(\cos\theta) (\cos\Delta\theta)-(\sin\theta)(\sin\Delta\theta)-\cos\theta.

Now,use approximations:
\sin\Delta\theta=\Delta\theta
\cos\Delta\theta=1

Then the uncertainty becomes:
|\Delta\cos\theta|=(\sin\theta)(\Delta\theta)

As for the second part,what do u mean of uncertainty 0...??
 
dextercioby said:
As for the second part,what do u mean of uncertainty 0...??

Thanks for the quick reply.. By 0, I mean that there is no uncertainty on time
 
thegame said:
Thanks for the quick reply.. By 0, I mean that there is no uncertainty on time

Why wouldn't it be??Just because you estimated the time of the reflex to be be the same,that doesn't mean that your hand muscles will behave the same.Hell,if that period of oscillation is big,u might get drunk inbetween and your hand could be tremblin' like s***. :-p Then the uncertainties will depend on the amount of alcohol in your blood. :-p

Daniel.

PS.This kind of systematic and subjective errors is a bit tricky.It depends on the human body which can malfunction in between condecutive identical experiments.
 
It's worth mentioning that your brain is anticipating when the bob passes the reference point, so your actual uncertainty will most likely actually be less than your raw reaction time. I'd probably guess around .15 or .2 seconds of uncertainty, although .3s would probably be pretty safe.

Additionally, if you measure 10 or so periods at a time, your uncertainty would be less than \sigma / 10.

Also, you might try simply to repeat the measurement a large number of times and use the unadjusted standard deviation of that set of data for the uncertainty.

I'd be a little concerned with how the period is being measured, since the end up the upswing isn't a very distinguished point as far as the human eye is concerned. How well you can tell when the bob passes the reference point can add some uncertainty, especially if you're using points like at the end of the upswing.

I suppose the moral of the story is that the uncertainty on time depends on a lot of factors, not just your raw reaction time.

--J
 
Thanks Justin, dextor.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top