Eclipsing binary stars question

  • Thread starter Thread starter warfreak131
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binary Stars
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the flux ratios of an eclipsing binary star system with two stars of differing temperatures and sizes. Star 1 has a surface temperature of 5000 K and is larger, while Star 2 has a temperature of 10000 K and a radius four times smaller. The challenge lies in computing the flux ratios fa/fnormal and fb/fnormal, considering that the light from one star is blocked when the other passes in front. Participants express confusion over whether to use flux or brightness for these calculations, as the question focuses on flux without mentioning brightness. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in the problem statement regarding how to account for the light obstruction during eclipses.
warfreak131
Messages
186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Figure 1 showed the light curve for an exlipsing binary system. This system consists of 2 stars. Star is is the larrger of the stars, and has a surface temp of T1=5000 K. Star 2 has a surface temp of T2=10000K. The ratio of their radii is R1/R2=4. Fnormal is the flux from the system when neither star is blocked. and fa and fb are the fluxes when star 2 passes in front of, or behind star 1, as seen from Earth.

(A)Compute fa/fnormal
(B)Compute fb/fnormal

The light curve looks like this:

http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/users/mendez/ASTRO110LAB07/modeleb.gif

where the top line is fnormal, the drop at x=.5 is fa, and the drop at x=1 is fb.

Homework Equations



Flux = {\sigma}T^{4}
Brightness = {\pi}R^{2}{\sigma}T^{4}

The Attempt at a Solution



I am being thrown off because the question says compare the fluxes, but just computing the flux doesn't take into account the fact that you are blocking out some light from each star when one passes in front of another. For that I would use brightness, but he makes no mention of using brightness in the question.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry, i didnt post this in the astronomy section
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top