[EE] Figuring out the E and B fields from two dipoles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric (E) and magnetic (B) fields from two dipoles, focusing on the correct interpretation of the R̅ vector in the context of the problem. The user expresses confusion about the definition of R̅, noting that traditional literature uses a different formula that is not accessible for their exam. They clarify that R represents the vector from the dipole to the point of interest and that r cannot be zero. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem, indicating it is not suitable for introductory physics. Understanding the precise definitions of these vectors is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
Ran4
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Image of the problem:
xY1SL.png


It should be very straightforward: derivate p twice and insert it into the equation. I can do all that, but what is the R̅ vector supposed to be? I've read the literature, but it uses a different formula (that I'm not allowed to have with me to the exam) and it never defines R̅. Traditionally it's always been r̅ = r̅' - r̅, where r̅' is the end position and r is the start position, so I suppose that means r̅ = (0,0,0).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is definitely not an introductory physics problem. As for what the vectors mean, R is the vector from the dipole to the point of interest, and r is not 0.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top