EE vs. Applied Physics (different than become an engineer thread I think)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision between pursuing a PhD in Applied Physics versus Electrical Engineering (EE), particularly in the context of Nanophotonics and Optoelectronics. The original poster, a senior in an Applied Physics program, expresses interest in understanding which path would better facilitate innovative contributions to the field. Participants note that the distinction between Applied Physics and EE is increasingly blurred, especially in research contexts, with Applied Physics focusing more on theoretical understanding and EE on practical applications. They suggest that the choice may depend on specific research groups and faculty expertise rather than a strict separation between the disciplines. Recommendations include reaching out to faculty members and reviewing relevant literature to identify the best fit for research interests.
skinnyLips
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
EE vs. Applied Physics (different than "become an engineer thread" I think)

Hello all,

I read through the first few pages of the "So U want to Engineer" thread, but the gist was not quite was I was hoping.

Ok, I am about to be a senior in an Applied Physics program in North Carolina. I work in a Raman Spec. lab. I get good enough grades that I believe I can be accepted to a PhD school somewhere. So beyond that...

I am very interested in the field of Nanophotonics/Optoelectronics. It seems like there is fresh ground to be broken, which I find very compelling. The problem I am having is that I thought this field was in the realm of Applied Physics (and I think it very well could be), but a lot of searching returns EE programs. I am totally open to that route, but I am having a really hard time telling which one will allow me to really think through and understand the field from the ground up in a way which will best allow me to make novel contributions.


TLTR: I am trying to read as much as I can about both types of programs (Applied Physics vs. EE), but I am really hoping someone on the forum has experience with, or thought about, the same type of dilemma. I may just have to buck up and start making calls to the heads of the research groups I have been reading about..

Please let me know if I should be more specific in the information I am requesting,

skinny
 
Physics news on Phys.org


skinnyLips said:
I may just have to buck up and start making calls to the heads of the research groups I have been reading about..

There you go.
 


EE is basically Applied Physics, the line blurs more and more as you get deeper and deeper into research (In my opinion anyways). It doesn't surprise me that most of the results for EE programs, it is where you would get the most people caring about electronics isn't it?

The difference between the programs really depends on the school you're looking out but the general difference between engineering and physics is that physics searches for a deeper understanding and engineering searches for answers to practical problems. So I would imagine an Applied Physics would be the way to go.

I'm not a PhD student but I am an undergraduate studying Engineering Physics and doing an EE minor. I've often considered the EE major but chose physics because the program seemed to be more about deeper understanding of nature while EE was more for practical solutions to problems and I plan on doing research later on.
 


Every research group is different - there are no generalities that will help here. There are research groups in EE departments that do pure physics (I was in one), and the are groups in applied physics departments that do more engineering, and vice versa of course.

If there are faculty in your department familiar with this area I would ask them what schools they recommend. Beyond that, contacting the professors at the universities you are considering is one approach to try. Looking in the literature to see where publications of interest are coming from is also another approach.

good luck,

jason
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top