Effect of electric field on a dielectric

Rajat jaiswal
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
friends,
can anyone explain me the effect of electric field on a dielectric(non- conducting) medium
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, let's have a look at the effect an external field creates on an otherwise spherical atom. When the atom is placed in the external field, the positive charges tend to move along the direction of the field while negative electron gas cloud in the opposite direction. If the field is strong enough it will break the atom with the electrons ripped off. (That is ionization). But if the field is not too large, there is an effective separation of positive and negative charges on the atom which leads to the formation of a dipole. For small fields, it is found that the induced dipole \vec{p}=\alpha \vec{E}, where \alpha is the atomic polarizability.

Coming to a dielectric, when it is placed in an external field little dipoles are created which essentially point in the same direction. So if we consider a homogeneous dielectric, the positive charge of one dipole coincides with the negative one of the next one and effectively cancels it. This leads to the cancellation of all the charges within the bulk leaving out charges sticking on a very thin layer on the surface. The surface whose (outward) normal is opposite the field gets a negative charge while that one having the normal in the direction of the field gets a positive charge. These charge then create a field of their own which runs in the direction opposite that of the external field. The total field is the sum of the two fields: \vec{E}_\mathrm{tot}=\vec{E}_\mathrm{ext}+\vec{E}_\mathrm{d}. Since the two fields are opposite inside the dielectric, the resultant field is less inside the dielectric.
However, these are the consequences. The answer to your question should be: An electric field polarizes a dielectric.
 
...you mean:
\vec{E}_\mathrm{tot}=\vec{E}_\mathrm{ext}-\vec{E}_\mathrm{d}
 
no drizzle. you add them vectorically. the effect will be to subtract their magnitude since the two vectors are pointing in opposite directions.
 
I’m quite convenient with the sign of the vector been represented in the equation [it symbolizes a direction], it also could be written this way;

\vec{E}_\mathrm{tot}=\vec{E}_\mathrm{ext}+(-\vec{E}_\mathrm{d})
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top