Effective resistance in a pentagram of resistors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the effective resistance in a pentagram configuration of resistors, where each branch has resistance "r." The key to solving the problem lies in applying Kirchhoff's laws and recognizing the symmetry of the circuit, which simplifies the analysis. The effective resistance between any two adjacent joints is determined to be 2/5 r, as the current divides among the paths due to symmetry. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding how currents flow and the role of the triangle formed by the other vertices, which does not contribute to the current flow. The conversation reflects on the challenges posed by unconventional resistor configurations in physics homework.
bassist11
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So I have a pentagram of resistors, one in each branch of resistance "r". Each joint is also connected to the two joints across from it but none of the wires inside the pentagram are connected. I need to find the resistance between any two adjacent joints.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Basically, I know I have to assign currents to each branch first and assume I know these currents because in the end they will divide out anyways. I know Kirchhoff's laws and how to add resistors in parallel and series. I'm just stuck on how the currents divide. Our teacher has given us an answer of 2/5 resistance and if you divide the current going in at one point into four due to symmetry, you won't get that.

Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what the circuit is you're describing, but it sounds like you might be in one of the configurations that is neither parallel nor series. In this case, you need Kirchhoff.
 
It is a "trick" problem. Either you see the solution or you don't. Letter the points of the pentagram ABCDE in order around the perimeter. Now, if you want to calculate the current from A to B, assuming they are the only connections to an external current source, start by ignoring the triangle CDE. You have one path of resistance r and three paths of resistance 2r. Now notice that the symmetry of the circuit means that you can't tell vertices C, D, and E apart. Each is the mid-point of one of the 2r paths, and each is part of triangle CDE. By renaming the verticies you can see that current won't flow in triangle CDE. (Or manybe you can't see it, a lot of students have trouble doing the mental gymnastics.)

So A and B are directly connected by a resistor of 1 r, and indirectly by three circuits of resitance 2 r. The easiest way to proceed now is to look at the currents. If r is 1 ohm, and the voltage from A to B is one volt, you will have a current of 1 Ampere through the direct path, and three 1/2 Ampere currents through the other vertices. Total current 5/2 Ampere, effective resistance 2/5 r.
 
That helps a ton^ When I was working it earlier, I kind of came to the same conclusion about no current flowing through that upper triangle. I think I just went wrong though when I divided the current into four when it comes in.

Would I be right in saying that the effective resistance is the same between any two points?

Our physics teacher has just been piling these "novelty" resistor problems on us.. We've done the cube, two infinite chains, a square, a diamond, you name it..
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top