Efficiency of a heat engine in a reversible cycle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the efficiency of a heat engine operating in a reversible cycle involving adiabatic expansion, isothermal compression, and heating at constant volume. The calculated efficiencies are 30% for the cycle and 60% for the Carnot efficiency, with a comparison indicating that the Carnot efficiency is 50%. The user expresses uncertainty about deriving the cycle efficiency using only two temperatures and a heat capacity ratio. Key equations discussed include the work done during adiabatic and isothermal processes, and the relationship between work output and input. The user suspects an error in their calculations and seeks clarification on the efficiency determination.
JSmith123
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A heat engine operates in a reversible cycle with the following steps:
282iyop.jpg

(i) An ideal gas characterized by γ = 1.4 expands adiabatically, so that it cools from an initial temperature of 330°C to 30°C.
(ii) It is compressed isothermally until it reaches its initial volume.
(iii) It is then heated at constant volume until it reaches its initial temperature.

Calculate the efficiency of the cycle.
η =

Compare your answer above with the Carnot efficiency that corresponds to these temperatures.
η/η_Carnot =

Homework Equations


η_Carnot = 1 - T_c/T_h


The Attempt at a Solution


The answers are 0.30 and 60%. I know how to get the Carnot efficiency, but I'm not sure how to solve for the first answer. How do you find the efficiency with just 2 temperatures and a heat capacity ratio?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Obviously the carnot eff= 50%

cycle efficiency=Work out/work in

Look first at the adiabatic process.The equation for work is just -n*R*(T_f-T_i)/(Y-1)

You can use the ratios of temperatures and volumes for adiabatic processes to find V_f/V_i that ratio is important because it is the same ratio needed for the isothermal process.

For the isothermal process W=-n*R*T*(V_f/V_i)

The cycle efficiency should be the ratio of isothermal work and adabatic work which is 70%, it should be 30% or 1-.7

There is a mistake somewhere, if some one finds it let me know!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top