Eigenvalue Problem in Uniformly Acceleration Motion

AI Thread Summary
In the context of uniformly accelerated motion, the force is constant, leading to a potential V(x) = Fx and a Hamiltonian H = (p^2/2m) - Fx. The eigenvalue problem to solve is Hψ(x) = Eψ(x). The discussion highlights confusion regarding the application of quantum mechanics to this scenario, particularly due to a lack of references in textbooks. Participants suggest that the problem may involve Airy functions as potential solutions and seek clarification on the interpretation of uniformly accelerating motion for a single particle. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of the mathematical framework to tackle the eigenvalue problem effectively.
jshw
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In Uniform Acceleration Motion, the force F is constant.
then potential V(x)=Fx, and Hamiltonian H=(p^2/2m)-Fx
The problem is to solve the eigenvalue problem Hpsi(x)=Epsi(x)


Homework Equations


F=constant
V(x)=Fx
H=(p^2/2m)-Fx


The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to compare classical mechanics and quantum mechanincs.
but, my QM textbook don't mention about uniformly acceleration motion.
I had hard time to solve it during this weekend. but I get lost the direction to solve it.
I think that this problem is mathematically messy. please give me the direction to solve this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jshw,

I don't completely understand what you're asking.

I'm guessing Fx is the partial of F with respect to x, so is the potential (V(x)) Fx everywhere? in a one-dimensional setting? (i.e. is this a particle in a 1D box with constant potential across the bottom of the whole box?)

classically, I think 'uniformly accelerating' means that every part of an object is accelerating in same direction, at the same rate (as opposed to an object spinning through air, for instance) but I'm not sure what it means in the context of a single particle; perhaps it's as simple as constant acceleration...?
 
Your Hamiltonian certainly looks like having Airy function as a possible solution.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top