Eigenvectors of "squeezed" amplitude operator

carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Prove that the states $$|z, \alpha \rangle = \hat S(z)\hat D(\alpha) | 0 \rangle $$ $$|\alpha, z \rangle = \hat D(\alpha) \hat S(z)| 0 \rangle $$
are eigenvectors of the squeezed amplitude operator $$ \hat b = \hat S(z) \hat a \hat S ^\dagger (z) = \mu \hat a + \nu \hat a ^\dagger $$, with μ, ν and z being complex numbers and where $$\hat D(\alpha) = e^{\alpha \hat a ^\dagger - \alpha ^* \hat a }$$ is the displacement operator and $$ \hat S(z) = e ^{ \frac{z^*}{2} \hat a ^2 - \frac{z}{2} \hat a ^{\dagger 2}}$$ is the compression operator.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first one I've tried $$ \hat b \hat S(z)\hat D(\alpha) | 0 \rangle = \hat S(z) \hat a \hat S ^\dagger (z) \hat S(z)\hat D(\alpha) | 0 \rangle = \hat S(z) \hat a | \alpha \rangle $$, but I can't get farther than that. I've tried and reordering the exponentials, writing them as taylor series, and writing the coherent state α as a sum of number states n. but I haven't got nowhere.

I have the feeling that the solution is much easier than what I am doing. Could anyone point me in the right direction?

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carllacan said:
$$ \hat b \hat S(z)\hat D(\alpha) | 0 \rangle = \hat S(z) \hat a \hat S ^\dagger (z) \hat S(z)\hat D(\alpha) | 0 \rangle = \hat S(z) \hat a | \alpha \rangle $$
Just a few more (if not one) steps needed. Remember that the coherent state is an eigenstate of ##\hat{a}##.
 
  • Like
Likes carllacan
blue_leaf77 said:
Just a few more (if not one) steps needed. Remember that the coherent state is an eigenstate of ##\hat{a}##.
Yes, I realized that I already had the solution just after I went to bed. I'm retarded, haha. And the other state is easy to prove once you have this one. Using D(α)S(z) = S(z)D(μα+να*) it's easy to see that it's an eigenvector with eigenvalue μα+να*.

Thanks for your help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top