Eikonal equation and trajectory of a ray of light

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the eikonal equation for the trajectory of light, as derived in Born and Wolf's "Principles of Optics." The equation, which relates the index of refraction to the displacement vector, raises questions about its limitations, particularly as the wavelength approaches zero. It is noted that the eikonal approximation breaks down when the wavenumber k goes to zero, and a more detailed derivation is suggested through Fermat's principle or Huyghen's wavelets. An informal derivation of the eikonal equation is provided in the author's lecture notes, emphasizing the need for thorough understanding. The conversation highlights the relationship between the eikonal equation and particle dynamics, particularly for charged particles.
PhilDSP
Messages
643
Reaction score
15
On page 122 of Born and Wolf's "Principles of Optics" the following equation for the trajectory of a ray of light is glibly derived in association with the eikonal equation.

\frac{d}{d \bf s} (n \frac{d \bf r}{d \bf s}) = \nabla n
where n is the index of refraction and r is the displacement vector

This equation is extremely interesting because much earlier J. J. Thomson developed it into an equation of motion for the electron. But details in its derivation are sadly missing in both places.

What are the limitations? Does the equation degenerate as the wavelength approaches zero? Does anyone have references to a more detailed derivation?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
It is only approximately correct if the wavelength is much smaller than the typical variation length scale. In other words,
##|k^{-2}||\nabla k| \ll 1##
where k is the wavenumber.

If k goes to zero somewhere, then the eikonal approximation breaks down.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
You can derive the eikonal equation by using Fermat's principle and the calculus of variations.

The alternative approach is to start with Huyghen's wavelets.
 
Thanks Khashishi and UltrafastPED. That equation stands a bit apart from the eikonal equation and so doesn't necessarily inherit all of the eikonal equation's limitations. So it seems that the only way to know the details is to do the work of deriving that equation from scratch.
 
I give an informal derivation of both forms of the eikonal equation, along with some discussion in lecture 10 of Notes on Analytical Mechanics: "Connection to Optics".

Available (free) here: https://sites.google.com/site/ultrafastped/
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Excellent! Thanks again
 
J. J. Thomson specified, by the way, that {\bf v} will represent the group velocity of a particle from which we can get the relationships

d {\bf s} = {\bf v} dt and {\bf v} = nc

Hence
\frac{d}{d \bf s} (\frac{\bf v}{c} \frac{d \bf r}{d \bf s}) = \nabla n
and
\frac{1}{\bf v} \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{1}{\bf v} \frac{d \bf r}{dt}) = \frac{c}{\bf v} \nabla n
or
\frac{d^2 \bf r}{dt^2} = nc^2 \nabla n
Equating \frac{d^2 \bf r}{dt^2} with the acceleration of the particle and allowing the particle to have mass we get
{\bf F} = m{\bf a} = mnc^2 \nabla n
This applies to a [STRIKE]charged[/STRIKE] elementary particle only of course which is not close to any boundary

P.S. I've striked through the word charged as evidently the equation before inserting mass applies to a photon.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top